Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #24167
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: jonesforth: taking up the challenge |
| References | <51ae2e6d$0$26867$e4fe514c@dreader37.news.xs4all.nl> <85fvws2yrp.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> <51c1829b$0$6079$e4fe514c@dreader36.news.xs4all.nl> <85vc5av1ib.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> <51c18b7f$0$6068$e4fe514c@dreader36.news.xs4all.nl> |
| From | Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> |
| Organization | nocrew |
| Date | 2013-07-05 07:41 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <85siztlg15.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> (permalink) |
Albert van der Horst wrote: > You explain why I want to redo the Jones effort based on ISO. I'm > going to leave out DO .. LOOP for pedogagical reasons But it wouldn't really be a Standard Forth then, would it? > > I have seen plenty of different file endings for Forth source > > code, but I haven't seen .fas before. > As you will notice on closer examination it is no forth source but > fasm source. Oh, sorry. > > Is your return stack large too? > > : (words) ?dup if dup >lfa @ recurse id. then ; > > : words context @ (words) ; > > The MS-DOS version could have problems. I have some euler problems > where stacks can grow to Megabytes, so I now have the habit to keep > data on the data stack. Are you saying that your return stack is significantly smaller than the data stack? In my mind, with some >R 2>R N>R going on in a program, the stacks could plausibly require about the same amount of memory. Highly application-specific, of course.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: jonesforth: taking up the challenge albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-06-19 10:06 +0000
Re: jonesforth: taking up the challenge Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2013-06-19 12:27 +0200
Re: jonesforth: taking up the challenge albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-06-19 10:44 +0000
Re: jonesforth: taking up the challenge Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2013-07-05 07:41 +0200
Re: jonesforth: taking up the challenge albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-05 14:45 +0000
Re: jonesforth: taking up the challenge Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-05 09:58 -0500
Re: jonesforth: taking up the challenge albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-12 02:06 +0000
Re: jonesforth: taking up the challenge "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-11 18:36 -1000
Re: jonesforth: taking up the challenge albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-12 17:36 +0000
Re: jonesforth: taking up the challenge "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-12 07:59 -1000
Re: jonesforth: taking up the challenge Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-12 11:23 -0700
Re: jonesforth: taking up the challenge Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-07-12 21:10 +0200
Re: jonesforth: taking up the challenge "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-13 06:19 -0400
csiph-web