Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.forth > #11961

Re: Top 3 implementations?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.chainon-marquant.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.11.MISMATCH!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From hwfwguy@gmail.com
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Top 3 implementations?
Date Mon, 7 May 2012 10:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
Organization http://groups.google.com
Lines 8
Message-ID <7640348.1159.1336411369916.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynff16> (permalink)
References <ba1eb66e-6001-4edc-b10e-b5976728b2d6@t23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <7c0208d6-3748-4d64-a8c4-8061a03771ae@g38g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <jnucnh$t3p$2@online.de> <ovmdnVPlNtmNVT_SnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@supernews.com> <64ccf3f0-60fb-4df2-9e51-daab5e6b6d57@p6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <4fa44f95$0$6903$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host 74.202.4.125
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace posting.google.com 1336411370 21417 127.0.0.1 (7 May 2012 17:22:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date Mon, 7 May 2012 17:22:50 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To <4fa44f95$0$6903$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl>
Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=74.202.4.125; posting-account=6GCGIQoAAAAyO8IjR_VTwqiqLwx0Q_G8
User-Agent G2/1.0
X-Received-Bytes 1618
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.forth:11961

Show key headers only | View raw

On Friday, May 4, 2012 2:53:35 PM UTC-7, The Beez wrote:
> We're DEAD. We just don't know it yet.
> 
Like Bruce Willis in "The Sixth Sense"?

It could be that the few of us left are keeping the lights on until the Forth Renaissance.

How do you measure the usage of a language that's so simple that its users don't have to ask any questions?

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Top 3 implementations? Tarkin <tarkin000@gmail.com> - 2012-04-27 08:46 -0700
  Re: Top 3 implementations? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-27 11:02 -0700
    Re: Top 3 implementations? quiet_lad <gavcomedy@gmail.com> - 2012-05-03 11:10 -0700
  Re: Top 3 implementations? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-03 02:15 -0700
  Re: Top 3 implementations? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-03 02:15 -0700
    Re: Top 3 implementations? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-05-03 18:45 +0200
      Re: Top 3 implementations? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-05-03 08:01 -1000
        Re: Top 3 implementations? Rugxulo <rugxulo@gmail.com> - 2012-05-03 11:15 -0700
          Re: Top 3 implementations? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2012-05-04 23:53 +0200
            Re: Top 3 implementations? vandys@vsta.org - 2012-05-04 22:28 +0000
              Re: Top 3 implementations? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2012-05-05 13:09 +0200
                Re: Top 3 implementations? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201205.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-05-06 04:09 +0200
            Re: Top 3 implementations? Tarkin <tarkin000@gmail.com> - 2012-05-07 08:23 -0700
            Re: Top 3 implementations? hwfwguy@gmail.com - 2012-05-07 10:22 -0700
            Re: Top 3 implementations? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-05-08 13:41 -0700
              Re: Top 3 implementations? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-05-08 11:07 -1000
                Re: Top 3 implementations? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-05-08 14:26 -0700
                Re: Top 3 implementations? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-05-08 12:07 -1000
                Re: Top 3 implementations? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-05-09 02:45 -0500
                Re: Top 3 implementations? "Harry Vaderchi" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2012-05-09 09:15 +0100
          Re: Top 3 implementations? Tarkin <tarkin000@gmail.com> - 2012-05-07 08:20 -0700
        Re: Top 3 implementations? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-10 04:50 -0700
          Re: Top 3 implementations? Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-05-15 10:45 +0000
            Re: Top 3 implementations? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-05-15 23:58 -0700
              Re: Top 3 implementations? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-19 20:36 -0700
                Re: Top 3 implementations? Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-05-20 21:41 +0000
                Re: Top 3 implementations? "A. K." <akk@nospam.org> - 2012-05-21 00:55 +0200
                Re: Top 3 implementations? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-20 22:26 -0700
                Re: Top 3 implementations? hwfwguy@gmail.com - 2012-05-22 10:20 -0700
      Re: Top 3 implementations? quiet_lad <gavcomedy@gmail.com> - 2012-05-03 11:08 -0700

csiph-web