Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #12315
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
|---|---|
| From | Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> |
| Subject | Re: Top 3 implementations? |
| Date | 2012-05-20 21:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m4cc8m.n4o@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> (permalink) |
| Organization | Dutch Forth Workshop |
| References | <ba1eb66e-6001-4edc-b10e-b5976728b2d6@t23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <m428k5.gy9@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> <7xliks1ukc.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <565dd8be-314d-4696-88f0-ea91f43a53cf@ri8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> |
In article <565dd8be-314d-4696-88f0-ea91f43a53cf@ri8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>, Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> wrote: > >The closest anybody comes to the good-old-days of selling software as >a product, is in the micro-controller field. Actually though, it is >the circuit-board that is the product, not the software. The software >is valued according to how much it costs (in wages) to produce it, but >this has little or no relation to how many boards it will get burned >into. The programming world is remarkably similar to what Karl Marx >described, in which every product is valued according to how many >hours went into making it, rather than what the product does. > >Communism may have failed as an economic system for the material >world, but it has a rock-solid hold on the programming world. A strange conclusion. It is too early to say whether capitalism isn't failing even worse. The last time we had a recession like this (1929) Russia was doing better than the west economically. Admitting that Marx had some economic insight applicable to software by saying that "communism has a rock solid hold on the programming world" is just weird. You can't make money by making a product. You must sell Rolexes, 50 euro worth of technology, and 950 euro hot air, hype and "IP". Groetjes Albert -- -- Albert van der Horst, UTRECHT,THE NETHERLANDS Economic growth -- being exponential -- ultimately falters. albert@spe&ar&c.xs4all.nl &=n http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Top 3 implementations? Tarkin <tarkin000@gmail.com> - 2012-04-27 08:46 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-27 11:02 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? quiet_lad <gavcomedy@gmail.com> - 2012-05-03 11:10 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-03 02:15 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-03 02:15 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-05-03 18:45 +0200
Re: Top 3 implementations? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-05-03 08:01 -1000
Re: Top 3 implementations? Rugxulo <rugxulo@gmail.com> - 2012-05-03 11:15 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2012-05-04 23:53 +0200
Re: Top 3 implementations? vandys@vsta.org - 2012-05-04 22:28 +0000
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2012-05-05 13:09 +0200
Re: Top 3 implementations? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201205.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-05-06 04:09 +0200
Re: Top 3 implementations? Tarkin <tarkin000@gmail.com> - 2012-05-07 08:23 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? hwfwguy@gmail.com - 2012-05-07 10:22 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-05-08 13:41 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-05-08 11:07 -1000
Re: Top 3 implementations? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-05-08 14:26 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-05-08 12:07 -1000
Re: Top 3 implementations? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-05-09 02:45 -0500
Re: Top 3 implementations? "Harry Vaderchi" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2012-05-09 09:15 +0100
Re: Top 3 implementations? Tarkin <tarkin000@gmail.com> - 2012-05-07 08:20 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-10 04:50 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-05-15 10:45 +0000
Re: Top 3 implementations? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-05-15 23:58 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-19 20:36 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-05-20 21:41 +0000
Re: Top 3 implementations? "A. K." <akk@nospam.org> - 2012-05-21 00:55 +0200
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-20 22:26 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? hwfwguy@gmail.com - 2012-05-22 10:20 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? quiet_lad <gavcomedy@gmail.com> - 2012-05-03 11:08 -0700
csiph-web