Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #11961
| From | hwfwguy@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Top 3 implementations? |
| Date | 2012-05-07 10:22 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <7640348.1159.1336411369916.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynff16> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <7c0208d6-3748-4d64-a8c4-8061a03771ae@g38g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <jnucnh$t3p$2@online.de> <ovmdnVPlNtmNVT_SnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@supernews.com> <64ccf3f0-60fb-4df2-9e51-daab5e6b6d57@p6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <4fa44f95$0$6903$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> |
On Friday, May 4, 2012 2:53:35 PM UTC-7, The Beez wrote: > We're DEAD. We just don't know it yet. > Like Bruce Willis in "The Sixth Sense"? It could be that the few of us left are keeping the lights on until the Forth Renaissance. How do you measure the usage of a language that's so simple that its users don't have to ask any questions?
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Top 3 implementations? Tarkin <tarkin000@gmail.com> - 2012-04-27 08:46 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-27 11:02 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? quiet_lad <gavcomedy@gmail.com> - 2012-05-03 11:10 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-03 02:15 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-03 02:15 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-05-03 18:45 +0200
Re: Top 3 implementations? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-05-03 08:01 -1000
Re: Top 3 implementations? Rugxulo <rugxulo@gmail.com> - 2012-05-03 11:15 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2012-05-04 23:53 +0200
Re: Top 3 implementations? vandys@vsta.org - 2012-05-04 22:28 +0000
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2012-05-05 13:09 +0200
Re: Top 3 implementations? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201205.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-05-06 04:09 +0200
Re: Top 3 implementations? Tarkin <tarkin000@gmail.com> - 2012-05-07 08:23 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? hwfwguy@gmail.com - 2012-05-07 10:22 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-05-08 13:41 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-05-08 11:07 -1000
Re: Top 3 implementations? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-05-08 14:26 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-05-08 12:07 -1000
Re: Top 3 implementations? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-05-09 02:45 -0500
Re: Top 3 implementations? "Harry Vaderchi" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2012-05-09 09:15 +0100
Re: Top 3 implementations? Tarkin <tarkin000@gmail.com> - 2012-05-07 08:20 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-10 04:50 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-05-15 10:45 +0000
Re: Top 3 implementations? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-05-15 23:58 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-19 20:36 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-05-20 21:41 +0000
Re: Top 3 implementations? "A. K." <akk@nospam.org> - 2012-05-21 00:55 +0200
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-20 22:26 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? hwfwguy@gmail.com - 2012-05-22 10:20 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? quiet_lad <gavcomedy@gmail.com> - 2012-05-03 11:08 -0700
csiph-web