Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #11929
| From | vandys@vsta.org |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Top 3 implementations? |
| Date | 2012-05-04 22:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <a0j3fpFod3U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <7c0208d6-3748-4d64-a8c4-8061a03771ae@g38g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <jnucnh$t3p$2@online.de> <ovmdnVPlNtmNVT_SnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@supernews.com> <64ccf3f0-60fb-4df2-9e51-daab5e6b6d57@p6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <4fa44f95$0$6903$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> |
Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> wrote: > We're DEAD. We just don't know it yet. More accurately, Forth is somewhere between the PDP-8 and the PDP-11 in terms of its downward trajectory. It's still out there, and there are even jobs to be had doing it. But not as many as there were 10 years ago, and more than there will be in another 10 years. (None of these comments are directed towards Mr. Moore's work--it's brilliant and I don't feel competent to comment on how it might do in the world.) -- Andy Valencia Home page: http://www.vsta.org/andy/ To contact me: http://www.vsta.org/contact/andy.html
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Top 3 implementations? Tarkin <tarkin000@gmail.com> - 2012-04-27 08:46 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-27 11:02 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? quiet_lad <gavcomedy@gmail.com> - 2012-05-03 11:10 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-03 02:15 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-03 02:15 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-05-03 18:45 +0200
Re: Top 3 implementations? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-05-03 08:01 -1000
Re: Top 3 implementations? Rugxulo <rugxulo@gmail.com> - 2012-05-03 11:15 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2012-05-04 23:53 +0200
Re: Top 3 implementations? vandys@vsta.org - 2012-05-04 22:28 +0000
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hans Bezemer <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2012-05-05 13:09 +0200
Re: Top 3 implementations? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201205.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-05-06 04:09 +0200
Re: Top 3 implementations? Tarkin <tarkin000@gmail.com> - 2012-05-07 08:23 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? hwfwguy@gmail.com - 2012-05-07 10:22 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-05-08 13:41 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-05-08 11:07 -1000
Re: Top 3 implementations? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-05-08 14:26 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-05-08 12:07 -1000
Re: Top 3 implementations? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-05-09 02:45 -0500
Re: Top 3 implementations? "Harry Vaderchi" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2012-05-09 09:15 +0100
Re: Top 3 implementations? Tarkin <tarkin000@gmail.com> - 2012-05-07 08:20 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-10 04:50 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-05-15 10:45 +0000
Re: Top 3 implementations? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-05-15 23:58 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-19 20:36 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? Albert van der Horst <albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl> - 2012-05-20 21:41 +0000
Re: Top 3 implementations? "A. K." <akk@nospam.org> - 2012-05-21 00:55 +0200
Re: Top 3 implementations? Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-05-20 22:26 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? hwfwguy@gmail.com - 2012-05-22 10:20 -0700
Re: Top 3 implementations? quiet_lad <gavcomedy@gmail.com> - 2012-05-03 11:08 -0700
csiph-web