Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-11 > #18940

Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be?

From	"...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	alt.comp.os.windows-11
Subject	Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be?
Date	2025-05-02 01:53 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<vv1mkr$fa1a$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<vutflp$i9ph$1@dont-email.me> <m7eumiFr4u2U1@mid.individual.net> <vutu2k$v17q$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Alan K. wrote:
> On 4/30/25 11:42 AM, Andy Burns wrote:
>>   Alan K. wrote:
>>
>>> My boot sequence is to boot Linux, then from grub I pick my OS. I 
>>> usually have 3.
>>>
>>> Well great idea, but that causes Bitlocker to was the key on the next 
>>> windows boot.
>>> Man am I glad I wrote it down.  Whew!!!
>>>
>>> So I find that disabling it only stops till the next boot.
>>
>> You can easily de-bitlocker your C: partition
>>
>> Settings > Privacy & Security > Device Encryption
>> turn the slider to "off" and confirm,
>> then wait for it to churn through the whole partition.
>>
>>
>>
> That turns it off.   Can I delete the program itself?
> 

No.
  Off is Off. That's it.


-- 
...w¡ñ§±¤ñ

Back to alt.comp.os.windows-11 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

BitLocker - to be or not to be? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-04-30 11:30 -0400
  Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-04-30 16:42 +0100
    Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-04-30 15:35 -0400
      Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-05-01 12:13 -0400
        Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-05-01 17:49 +0100
          Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-05-02 12:05 -0400
      Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? "...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-05-02 01:53 -0400

csiph-web