Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-11 > #18905

Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be?

From Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
Newsgroups alt.comp.os.windows-11
Subject Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be?
Date 2025-05-01 17:49 +0100
Message-ID <m7hn02Fa2fkU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <vutflp$i9ph$1@dont-email.me> <m7eumiFr4u2U1@mid.individual.net> <vutu2k$v17q$1@dont-email.me> <vv06k4$32aqs$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Paul wrote:

> Alan K. wrote:
>>> That turns it off.   Can I delete the program itself?
> 
> Once it is off, it's off.
I agree, you could cause problems by some hacky method of removing it, 
then likely a monthly fix would reinstall it anyway.

Back to alt.comp.os.windows-11 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

BitLocker - to be or not to be? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-04-30 11:30 -0400
  Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-04-30 16:42 +0100
    Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-04-30 15:35 -0400
      Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-05-01 12:13 -0400
        Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-05-01 17:49 +0100
          Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-05-02 12:05 -0400
      Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? "...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-05-02 01:53 -0400

csiph-web