Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-11 > #18841
| From | "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-11 |
| Subject | BitLocker - to be or not to be? |
| Date | 2025-04-30 11:30 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vutflp$i9ph$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
History: I got a new laptop with Windows 11 pro. I did nothing to thwart changes to it
except my logical "I don't want 365 or any XBox'.
So it' up and running. I spent a day tweaking and getting my data files back in place.
Now I try to get Linux Mint to install side by side. Booting from a usb.
Boy was that ever hard. Finally I turned off secure boot. Now I could install Linux.
And that much worked.
My boot sequence is to boot Linux, then from grub I pick my OS. I usually have 3.
Well great idea, but that causes Bitlocker to was the key on the next windows boot.
Man am I glad I wrote it down. Whew!!!
So I find that disabling it only stops till the next boot. My options are limited but try
to uninstall Bitlocker seem to be my option.
SO, what am I going to mess with here. Google seem to tell me it's okay (in so many
words), but 'you never know when Microsoft will re-install it'.
Any ideas? Somebody must have bought a new PC lately, albeit not trying to do Linux.
--
Linux Mint 22.1, Cinnamon 6.4.8, Kernel 6.8.0-58-generic
Thunderbird 128.10.0esr, Mozilla Firefox 138.0
Alan K.
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-11 | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
BitLocker - to be or not to be? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-04-30 11:30 -0400
Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-04-30 16:42 +0100
Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-04-30 15:35 -0400
Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-05-01 12:13 -0400
Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-05-01 17:49 +0100
Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-05-02 12:05 -0400
Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? "...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-05-02 01:53 -0400
csiph-web