Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-11 > #18842
| From | Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-11 |
| Subject | Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? |
| Date | 2025-04-30 16:42 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <m7eumiFr4u2U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <vutflp$i9ph$1@dont-email.me> |
Alan K. wrote: > My boot sequence is to boot Linux, then from grub I pick my OS. I > usually have 3. > > Well great idea, but that causes Bitlocker to was the key on the next > windows boot. > Man am I glad I wrote it down. Whew!!! > > So I find that disabling it only stops till the next boot. You can easily de-bitlocker your C: partition Settings > Privacy & Security > Device Encryption turn the slider to "off" and confirm, then wait for it to churn through the whole partition.
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-11 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
BitLocker - to be or not to be? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-04-30 11:30 -0400
Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-04-30 16:42 +0100
Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-04-30 15:35 -0400
Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-05-01 12:13 -0400
Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-05-01 17:49 +0100
Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-05-02 12:05 -0400
Re: BitLocker - to be or not to be? "...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-05-02 01:53 -0400
csiph-web