Re: Editorial

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Editorial
Date	2015-10-30 20:36 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<vv0dgc-ob5.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<GuOdnTT0eeT8G6_LnZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <d15ef46a-95d5-441a-a27a-658eb55b7dc3@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

nuny@bid.nes <Alien8752@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 1:49:43 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> 
> (snippage)
> 
>>    I was an Associate Scientist and Principal Investigator while at Iowa
>>    State. I have taught at the university, community college and adult
>>    education levels for at least the last twenty years.
> 
>   You should therefore be competent to engage in actual discussion of at least some of the scientific topics you raise, yet you almost never do.
> 
>>    I post from the physics communities to educate, stimulate and foster
>>    better understanding and discussion.
> 
>   It isn't working. In fact, the more you do it the more it fails. What physics-related discussion does occur in sci.physics is almost NEVER in threads you start.
> 
>   Consider abandoning your strategy of copy-and-pasting article fragments on a limited list of topics from a limited list of publications and offering no commentary of your own.
> 
>   Instead, consider posting what _you_ think on a particular topic that is, or in your opinion should be, of interest to others here. Consider explaining _why_ that topic should be of interest. In other words, to start a discussion, offer _your_ arguments pro and/or con on a particular topic and seek the thoughts of others. Defend your position(s), if you can, but don't farm it out to YouTube videos done by others. Speak in *your* voice.
> 
>   That's what nearly everyone else here does. Yes, it gets rough at times, but you're an adult. Handle it.
> 
>   Look Sam, I'm an Aspie (look it up). We're congenitally not very good at initiating and holding conversations with others on ANY topic, yet I have no fear of doing so and if I may say so, am reasonably good at it. You see, in my 62 years I've learned to mimic most of the neurotypicals' conversational skill set. Sometimes, others here (and in real life) even mistake me for normal.
> 
>   What's holding *you* back, Sam? You obviously have sufficient spare time, and sufficient interest, to post on a variety of topics. Open up, let others know what you think. You *do* have some thoughts of your own, don't you?
> 
> 
>   Mark L. Fergerson

I think it is blazingly obvious he is incapable of original thought.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 15:49 -0500
  Re: Editorial gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-29 16:21 -0500
  Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-29 21:24 +0000
    Re: Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-29 18:59 -0500
      Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 05:04 +0000
        Re: Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 08:25 -0500
          Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 16:58 +0000
          Re: Editorial "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 11:14 -0800
  Re: Editorial Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-29 21:52 +0000
    Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-30 07:20 -0400
      Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 07:22 -0700
        Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 07:19 -0400
          Re: Editorial Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-10-31 18:14 +0000
            Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 17:15 -0400
          Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 11:13 -0700
            Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 17:14 -0400
              Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 16:28 -0700
                Re: Editorial xxein1@att.net - 2015-10-31 18:20 -0700
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 01:54 -0800
                Re: Editorial "Bobby Enriquez" <invalide@eyample.com> - 2015-11-01 06:36 -0800
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 07:35 -0800
                Re: Editorial "Mike Smith" <invalidd@example.com> - 2015-11-01 09:06 -0800
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 09:32 -0800
                Re: Editorial "Hank Hill" <invalidd@example.com> - 2015-11-01 11:03 -0800
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 11:25 -0800
                Re: Editorial gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-01 23:18 -0600
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 04:02 -0800
                Re: Editorial gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-02 08:41 -0600
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 07:34 -0800
                Re: Editorial "Maple Hall" <invalud@example.com> - 2015-11-02 07:01 -0800
                Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-01 10:36 -0500
                Re: Editorial Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 07:55 -0800
  Re: Editorial Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-10-30 11:32 -0400
  Re: Editorial "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 13:18 -0700
    Re: Editorial jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-30 20:36 +0000
    Re: Editorial pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-30 15:18 -0700
      Re: Editorial "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 23:16 -0700
        Re: Editorial dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-10-31 07:42 -0400
        Re: Editorial Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 18:54 -0500
  Re: Editorial Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2015-10-31 18:51 -0500
  Re: Editorial David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> - 2015-11-01 18:59 -0500
    Re: Editorial Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-01 19:32 -0600
      Re: Editorial benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 01:06 -0500

csiph-web