Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #183795
| From | Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.philosophy |
| Subject | Re: Scary AI |
| Date | 2025-04-17 20:22 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vts5uq$1p3ic$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <vt3oli$2omc2$1@dont-email.me> <vt3qqt$2rfml$1@dont-email.me> <vt42j1$326a7$1@dont-email.me> <vt43ma$337e2$1@dont-email.me> <20250418014050.57c6b5377c6c62bba4a595e4@gmail.moc> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 4/17/2025 6:40 PM, Anton Shepelev wrote: > Newyana2: > >> If you believe in scientific materialism then you might >> believe that consciousness is an emergent quality, arising >> from chemical reactions in the brain. > > Is this compatible with us perceiving our own consciousness > and being able to discuss it, which means it is casually > active? > > Do you mean strong (aka miraculous) emergence, or weak > emergence? IMHO, the weak variety is out of the question: > chemmical, electrical, and other material processes can > produce only other material processes, but not feelings, > emotions, qualia... > I don't support either premise. Do we perceive consciousness? That seems questionable. "I think, therefore I am" is a desperate grasping at ground, not an observation.
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Scary AI Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2025-04-08 16:26 +0100
Re: Scary AI "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-04-08 11:45 -0400
Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-08 12:39 -0400
Re: Scary AI Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2025-04-08 19:07 +0100
Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-08 14:45 -0400
Re: Scary AI Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2025-04-08 20:35 +0100
Re: Scary AI jetjock <jetjock@unkown.com> - 2025-04-09 14:01 -0500
Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-08 20:57 +0000
Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-08 17:16 -0400
Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-09 19:53 +0000
Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-09 16:47 -0400
Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-11 12:23 +0000
Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-11 13:31 -0400
Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 02:30 +0000
Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-13 07:49 -0400
Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 13:08 +0000
Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 02:38 +0000
Re: Scary AI Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2025-04-18 01:40 +0300
Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-17 20:22 -0400
Re: Scary AI Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-18 02:12 +0000
Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 06:44 +0000
Re: Scary AI Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2025-04-18 14:34 +0300
Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-08 20:46 +0000
Re: Scary AI Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2025-04-08 22:48 +0100
Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-09 09:50 +0000
Re: Scary AI occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2025-04-18 16:45 +0200
Re: Scary AI Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2025-04-09 05:29 +0200
Re: Scary AI Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2025-04-18 01:02 +0300
csiph-web