Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #183617

Re: Scary AI

From	Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	alt.comp.os.windows-10
Subject	Re: Scary AI
Date	2025-04-13 13:08 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<vtgd04$2vdok$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(7 earlier) <vt6mbn$1e7fe$1@dont-email.me> <vtb1jb$1ikm7$1@dont-email.me> <vtbjjr$26kj0$1@dont-email.me> <vtf7kh$1r22f$1@dont-email.me> <vtg8a9$2ran9$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> wrote:
> On 4/12/2025 10:30 PM, Chris wrote:
> 
>> This is the beauty and strength of the
>> scientific method. It is objective.
> 
>   Yes. You've highlighted the crux of my point in a
> nutshell. It assumes an empirically discoverable object
> and a neutral subject. Within that limited context,
> and only within that context, science is very useful.
> 
>    The subject can only be neutral, and the object can
> only be truly defined, within the confines of a paradigm
> assumed to be absolute truth.
> 
>   In any case, I can see that you're not able to see past
> the epistemological dogmas of Scientism, and the luxurious
> allure of certainty. It's those dogmas that make people think
> AI is intelligent. It's fear of uncertainty that reduces
> discussion to bickering and accusations.
> 
>   But I thought I'd just throw this out there and see if
> it rings any bells for anyone. I wasn't really thinking that
> it would in a tech forum.

Shame. I thought you would be interested in a conversation. 

Anyway thanks for sharing the yt link. Interesting topic.

Thread

Scary AI Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2025-04-08 16:26 +0100
  Re: Scary AI "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-04-08 11:45 -0400
  Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-08 12:39 -0400
    Re: Scary AI Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2025-04-08 19:07 +0100
      Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-08 14:45 -0400
        Re: Scary AI Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2025-04-08 20:35 +0100
          Re: Scary AI jetjock <jetjock@unkown.com> - 2025-04-09 14:01 -0500
        Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-08 20:57 +0000
          Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-08 17:16 -0400
            Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-09 19:53 +0000
              Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-09 16:47 -0400
                Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-11 12:23 +0000
                Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-11 13:31 -0400
                Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 02:30 +0000
                Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-13 07:49 -0400
                Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 13:08 +0000
                Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 02:38 +0000
            Re: Scary AI Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2025-04-18 01:40 +0300
              Re: Scary AI Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-17 20:22 -0400
                Re: Scary AI Borax Man <rotflol2@hotmail.com> - 2025-04-18 02:12 +0000
                Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-18 06:44 +0000
                Re: Scary AI Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2025-04-18 14:34 +0300
      Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-08 20:46 +0000
        Re: Scary AI Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2025-04-08 22:48 +0100
          Re: Scary AI Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-04-09 09:50 +0000
    Re: Scary AI occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2025-04-18 16:45 +0200
  Re: Scary AI Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2025-04-09 05:29 +0200
  Re: Scary AI Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2025-04-18 01:02 +0300

csiph-web