Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.comp.software.firefox > #12987

Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox

From Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam>
Newsgroups alt.comp.software.firefox
Subject Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox
Date 2025-04-07 17:29 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <vt1g2j$n6ii$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <knrhku8v6e1h$.dlg@v.nguard.lh> <vsu0di$14tjg$1@dont-email.me> <11ipcjfuklbaq.dlg@v.nguard.lh> <vt0f9e$3napu$1@dont-email.me> <vt1a8b$i6ag$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 4/7/2025 3:49 PM, Jeff Barnett wrote:

> I mostly agree with you saying the blame is two-way. In the Netscape 
> days, users were very enthusiastic about the volunteer efforts but felt 
> that there were too many unfriendly design decisions - recall that 
> Netscape was like a TB and FF merge. The support was by donations.
> 

   I used Netscape from maybe '99, but wasn't it originally
a paid program? I thought they were forced to go free by
MS coming out with IE jazzed up with ActiveX. I think I
switched from IE when a Win98 update to IE5 screwed
up my system. IE5 was running slomo. I never figured
out why. So I switched and never went back.


> I proposed, through the sponsored newsgroups, that we the users should 
> be prepared to pay a small fee recurring for the use of the software to 
> gain a voice in some of these feature decisions. The reaction to this 
> proposal was so bad that I never could have imagined it: the ground fact 
> was that the vast majority of users were "entitled spoiled brats" (ESB) 
> and treated me as a nut case for making such a suggestion.
> 
> The ESB mentality is the same that seems to justify ripping off movies, 
> software, and the like with Moral Turpitude.
> 
> Well the pendulum has been swing in the other direction for a while. A 
> substantial portion of the software production community has decided to 
> be paid for their products. There is nothing wrong with that. However 
> ESB want to see themselves as the center of the universe and, frankly, 
> that is just not going to work.
> 
> I am willing to pay reasonable fees for software applications that 
> deliver wanted capabilities and protect my interests and privacy; most 
> users are not. Some companies realized they could get paid and not be 
> responsible for protection: M$ learned how to directly intrude in our 
> life while collecting our money; Google learned how to make money on the 
> back end; the Government has been no help - they sued M$ for 
> monopolistic practices while DARPA simultaneously required that 
> financial sections of submitted proposals be done in Excel!; and Adobe, 
> well their just Adobe.

     One other big category of mutual sleaze is cellphone apps.
Once again, people don't expect to pay for apps. So developers
end up selling personal data to get paid. Because they can.

     20+ years ago I was writing shareware and actually made
a decent side income for a couple of years. But the vast majority
would steal it. I'd try to obfuscate activation codes but they'd
be cracked in 24 hours. Kids found it a fun challenge. I expect
that's timeless. People who've never had to support themselves
don't understand having to work and pay for things. I sometimes
wonder about that now with music. What happened to all those
collections of 40K songs that almost every teenager seemed
to have downloaded?

    Interestingly, the people who paid me for my software were
nearly all from the US Midwest. Whether I asked for a donation
or officially charged, there were the people who felt that fair
was fair. And almost all were average Americans.

Back to alt.comp.software.firefox | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Harder to keep loving Firefox VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-04-05 21:41 -0500
  Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Frank Miller <miller@posteo.ee> - 2025-04-06 05:20 +0200
    Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-04-06 04:32 -0500
      Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-04-06 04:36 -0500
  Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox John Diamond <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-06 04:24 +0100
    Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2025-04-07 11:59 +0200
  Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-06 09:44 -0400
    Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-04-06 17:48 -0500
      Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-07 08:10 -0400
        Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-04-07 13:32 -0500
          Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-07 15:31 -0400
            Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-04-07 19:01 -0500
        Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2025-04-07 13:49 -0600
          Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox (PS) Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2025-04-07 13:52 -0600
          Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-07 17:29 -0400
            Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-04-07 19:57 -0500
              Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-07 22:25 -0400
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-04-07 22:54 -0500
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-04-08 06:58 +0100
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-08 08:37 -0400
            Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-04-08 06:55 +0100
              Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-08 08:47 -0400
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox fredl@invalid.com - 2025-04-08 14:50 -0500
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> - 2025-04-08 22:18 +0200
                Harder to keep loving Firefox News <dnews@triffid.co.uk> - 2025-04-09 10:20 +0100
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> - 2025-04-09 20:50 +0200
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-09 17:06 -0400
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-08 17:19 -0400
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Frank Miller <miller@posteo.ee> - 2025-04-08 23:55 +0200
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-04-08 20:12 -0400
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-04-09 15:10 +0000
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2025-04-09 16:27 +0100
      Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> - 2025-04-07 19:27 +0200
      Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2025-04-11 11:50 -0700
        Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-04-11 16:45 -0500
          Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 09:29 -0700
            Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2025-04-13 17:15 +0000
              Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 12:36 -0700
              Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-04-13 16:54 -0500
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Nobody <jock@soccer.com> - 2025-04-13 16:05 -0700
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Winston <wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid> - 2025-04-14 03:11 -0400
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-04-14 06:21 -0500
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2025-04-16 08:03 -0700
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Nobody <jock@soccer.com> - 2025-04-16 08:17 -0700
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2025-04-16 08:49 -0700
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2025-04-16 16:43 +0100
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2025-04-17 09:59 -0700
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2025-04-16 16:40 +0000
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-04-16 14:22 -0500
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Schugo <schugo@schugo.de> - 2025-04-16 21:42 +0200
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-04-16 19:33 -0500
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2025-04-16 07:59 -0700
              Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2025-04-13 23:46 -0500
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2025-04-13 23:22 -0700
                Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com> - 2025-04-14 08:07 +0100
              Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-04-14 17:40 +0000
    Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-04-09 02:17 -0500
  Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com> - 2025-04-07 08:36 +0100
    Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-04-07 05:52 -0500
      Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com> - 2025-04-07 13:05 +0100
        Re: Harder to keep loving Firefox VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-04-07 13:54 -0500

csiph-web