Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #145996
| From | Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: One Note |
| Date | 2025-01-01 16:26 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vl3qc7$2rolg$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <vksakj.pns.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <vktlcn$1i26p$2@dont-email.me> <vku2pb.10qc.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <vl1opo$2dn4p$2@dont-email.me> <vl1tf7.5ag.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> |
Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote: > Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: >> Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote: >>> Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote: >>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Chris wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Android 16 is the current version so it's possible the OneNote doesn't >>>>>>>>>> support 13. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 15 is the newest release version, 16 is still in development. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> According to wikipedia it was released this month. >>>>>>> You clearly didn't read even the first paragraph >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Android 16 is the upcoming major release of Android. The first >>>>>>> developer preview was released on November 19, 2024. Google expects the >>>>>>> platform to reach beta stage in January 2025 with a final release >>>>>>> expected in the second quarter of 2025." >>>>>> >>>>>> The table here states it was released on 18th December: >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_version_history >>>>> >>>>> Nope, it doesn't. >>>>> >>>>> The "December 18, 2024" date is followed by a *note* '[29]', which is >>>>> - as always in Wikipedia - also a link. >>>>> >>>>> If you follow that link, you will get the 'Release notes' which cleary >>>>> says "Developer Preview 2", so exactly as Andy said "16 is still in >>>>> development" and proven by his (above quouted) quote from the Wikipedia >>>>> page. >>>>> >>>>> 'Release notes' >>>>> <https://developer.android.com/about/versions/16/release-notes> >>>> >>>> Then the table is wrong. I was simply doing a quick internet search to help >>>> the OP. >>> >>> That you can't be bothered to read for comprehension and follow links, >>> doesn't mean the table is wrong. See also Jörg comment about the colour >>> coding in the table. >>> >>>>> Of course all of this should have been blatantly obvious, as Android >>>>> *15* was only released little over 3 months earlier. New Android >>>>> versions come (too) quickly, but not *that* quickly. >>>> >>>> I don't use android, so not up to speed, hence why I thought wikipedia was >>>> accurate. >>> >>> Huh? Then why do you subscribe to this group and say (to Jörg) "It >>> isn't on my phone?". And once more, Wikipedia *is* accurate (on this >>> issue). >>> >>> That you overlooked the note, etc. is of course perfectly allright. >>> Being flippant when people correct you, not so much. >> >> How am I being flippant? I acknowledged the mistake. > > Sigh! You said (amongst others) "Then the table is wrong.", so you did > *not* acknowledge *your* mistake, but said that it was an error in the > Wikipedia page, which it isn't. > > Bottom line: You were wrong. The Wikipedia page is correct. I admit I made a mistake. In my defence, as I showed to Joerge, the wikipedia app doesn't render tables very well in dark mode. Given the OP is on android 13 he still could do with upgrading.
Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-23 17:11 -0700
Re: One Note Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2024-12-24 04:56 +0000
Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-24 08:41 -0700
Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-24 08:49 -0700
Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-24 09:03 -0700
Re: One Note Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2024-12-24 17:26 +0000
Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-25 11:03 -0700
Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-25 12:02 -0700
Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-30 09:23 -0700
Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 23:28 +0000
Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-26 10:40 -0700
Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 11:44 +0000
Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-28 09:07 -0700
Re: One Note Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-28 16:42 +0000
Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 01:44 +0000
Re: One Note Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2024-12-29 03:41 +0100
Re: One Note Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-29 10:14 +0000
Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 18:29 +0000
Re: One Note Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-29 18:35 +0000
Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 08:24 +0000
Re: One Note Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-12-29 19:15 +0000
Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 08:24 +0000
Re: One Note Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-12-30 11:13 +0000
Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 21:47 +0000
Re: One Note Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-12-31 22:07 +0000
Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 16:26 +0000
Re: One Note Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-01 16:52 +0000
Re: One Note Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2024-12-30 03:36 +0100
Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 08:24 +0000
Re: One Note Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2024-12-30 12:00 +0100
Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 16:14 +0000
Re: One Note Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-12-31 00:18 +0100
Re: One Note Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-12-31 00:17 +0100
csiph-web