Re: One Note

From	Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.mobile.android
Subject	Re: One Note
Date	2024-12-31 22:07 +0000
Organization	NOYB
Message-ID	<vl1tf7.5ag.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(8 earlier) <vks4df$1490f$1@dont-email.me> <vksakj.pns.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <vktlcn$1i26p$2@dont-email.me> <vku2pb.10qc.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <vl1opo$2dn4p$2@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
> Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
> > Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
> >>> Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
> >>>>> Chris wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Chris wrote:
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> Android 16 is the current version so it's possible the OneNote doesn't
> >>>>>>>> support 13.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> 15 is  the newest release version, 16 is still in development.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> According to wikipedia it was released this month.
> >>>>> You clearly didn't read even the first paragraph
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> "Android 16 is the upcoming major release of Android. The first 
> >>>>> developer preview was released on November 19, 2024. Google expects the 
> >>>>> platform to reach beta stage in January 2025 with a final release 
> >>>>> expected in the second quarter of 2025."
> >>>> 
> >>>> The table here states it was released on 18th December:
> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_version_history
> >>> 
> >>> Nope, it doesn't.
> >>> 
> >>> The "December 18, 2024" date is followed by a *note* '[29]', which is
> >>> - as always in Wikipedia - also a link.
> >>> 
> >>> If you follow that link, you will get the 'Release notes' which cleary
> >>> says "Developer Preview 2", so exactly as Andy said "16 is still in
> >>> development" and proven by his (above quouted) quote from the Wikipedia
> >>> page.
> >>> 
> >>> 'Release notes'
> >>> <https://developer.android.com/about/versions/16/release-notes>
> >> 
> >> Then the table is wrong. I was simply doing a quick internet search to help
> >> the OP. 
> > 
> >   That you can't be bothered to read for comprehension and follow links,
> > doesn't mean the table is wrong. See also Jörg comment about the colour
> > coding in the table.
> > 
> >>> Of course all of this should have been blatantly obvious, as Android
> >>> *15* was only released little over 3 months earlier. New Android
> >>> versions come (too) quickly, but not *that* quickly.
> >> 
> >> I don't use android, so not up to speed, hence why I thought wikipedia was
> >> accurate. 
> > 
> >   Huh? Then why do you subscribe to this group and say (to Jörg) "It
> > isn't on my phone?". And once more, Wikipedia *is* accurate (on this
> > issue).
> > 
> >   That you overlooked the note, etc. is of course perfectly allright.
> > Being flippant when people correct you, not so much.
> 
> How am I being flippant? I acknowledged the mistake. 

  Sigh! You said (amongst others) "Then the table is wrong.", so you did
*not* acknowledge *your* mistake, but said that it was an error in the
Wikipedia page, which it isn't.

  Bottom line: You were wrong. The Wikipedia page is correct.

Thread

One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-23 17:11 -0700
  Re: One Note Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2024-12-24 04:56 +0000
    Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-24 08:41 -0700
      Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-24 08:49 -0700
        Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-24 09:03 -0700
      Re: One Note Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2024-12-24 17:26 +0000
        Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-25 11:03 -0700
          Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-25 12:02 -0700
            Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-30 09:23 -0700
          Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 23:28 +0000
            Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-26 10:40 -0700
              Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 11:44 +0000
                Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-28 09:07 -0700
                Re: One Note Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-28 16:42 +0000
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 01:44 +0000
                Re: One Note Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2024-12-29 03:41 +0100
                Re: One Note Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-29 10:14 +0000
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 18:29 +0000
                Re: One Note Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-29 18:35 +0000
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 08:24 +0000
                Re: One Note Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-12-29 19:15 +0000
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 08:24 +0000
                Re: One Note Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-12-30 11:13 +0000
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 21:47 +0000
                Re: One Note Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-12-31 22:07 +0000
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 16:26 +0000
                Re: One Note Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-01 16:52 +0000
                Re: One Note Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2024-12-30 03:36 +0100
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 08:24 +0000
                Re: One Note Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2024-12-30 12:00 +0100
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 16:14 +0000
                Re: One Note Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-12-31 00:18 +0100
                Re: One Note Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-12-31 00:17 +0100

csiph-web