Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.mobile.android > #145843

Re: One Note

From Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.mobile.android
Subject Re: One Note
Date 2024-12-30 11:13 +0000
Organization NOYB
Message-ID <vku2pb.10qc.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <vkq9ia$kg5r$1@dont-email.me> <ltclomF2572U2@mid.individual.net> <vks4df$1490f$1@dont-email.me> <vksakj.pns.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <vktlcn$1i26p$2@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
> Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
> > Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
> >>> Chris wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
> >>>>>> Chris wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> Android 16 is the current version so it's possible the OneNote doesn't
> >>>>>> support 13.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 15 is  the newest release version, 16 is still in development.
> >>>> 
> >>>> According to wikipedia it was released this month.
> >>> You clearly didn't read even the first paragraph
> >>> 
> >>> "Android 16 is the upcoming major release of Android. The first 
> >>> developer preview was released on November 19, 2024. Google expects the 
> >>> platform to reach beta stage in January 2025 with a final release 
> >>> expected in the second quarter of 2025."
> >> 
> >> The table here states it was released on 18th December:
> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_version_history
> > 
> >   Nope, it doesn't.
> >   
> >   The "December 18, 2024" date is followed by a *note* '[29]', which is
> > - as always in Wikipedia - also a link.
> >   
> >   If you follow that link, you will get the 'Release notes' which cleary
> > says "Developer Preview 2", so exactly as Andy said "16 is still in
> > development" and proven by his (above quouted) quote from the Wikipedia
> > page.
> > 
> > 'Release notes'
> > <https://developer.android.com/about/versions/16/release-notes>
> 
> Then the table is wrong. I was simply doing a quick internet search to help
> the OP. 

  That you can't be bothered to read for comprehension and follow links,
doesn't mean the table is wrong. See also Jörg comment about the colour
coding in the table.

> >   Of course all of this should have been blatantly obvious, as Android
> > *15* was only released little over 3 months earlier. New Android
> > versions come (too) quickly, but not *that* quickly.
> 
> I don't use android, so not up to speed, hence why I thought wikipedia was
> accurate. 

  Huh? Then why do you subscribe to this group and say (to Jörg) "It
isn't on my phone?". And once more, Wikipedia *is* accurate (on this
issue).

  That you overlooked the note, etc. is of course perfectly allright.
Being flippant when people correct you, not so much.

Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-23 17:11 -0700
  Re: One Note Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2024-12-24 04:56 +0000
    Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-24 08:41 -0700
      Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-24 08:49 -0700
        Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-24 09:03 -0700
      Re: One Note Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2024-12-24 17:26 +0000
        Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-25 11:03 -0700
          Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-25 12:02 -0700
            Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-30 09:23 -0700
          Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 23:28 +0000
            Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-26 10:40 -0700
              Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 11:44 +0000
                Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-28 09:07 -0700
                Re: One Note Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-28 16:42 +0000
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 01:44 +0000
                Re: One Note Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2024-12-29 03:41 +0100
                Re: One Note Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-29 10:14 +0000
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 18:29 +0000
                Re: One Note Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-29 18:35 +0000
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 08:24 +0000
                Re: One Note Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-12-29 19:15 +0000
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 08:24 +0000
                Re: One Note Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-12-30 11:13 +0000
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 21:47 +0000
                Re: One Note Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-12-31 22:07 +0000
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 16:26 +0000
                Re: One Note Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-01 16:52 +0000
                Re: One Note Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2024-12-30 03:36 +0100
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 08:24 +0000
                Re: One Note Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2024-12-30 12:00 +0100
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 16:14 +0000
                Re: One Note Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-12-31 00:18 +0100
                Re: One Note Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-12-31 00:17 +0100

csiph-web