Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.mobile.android > #145955

Re: One Note

From Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.mobile.android
Subject Re: One Note
Date 2024-12-31 21:47 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <vl1opo$2dn4p$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <ltclomF2572U2@mid.individual.net> <vks4df$1490f$1@dont-email.me> <vksakj.pns.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <vktlcn$1i26p$2@dont-email.me> <vku2pb.10qc.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw

Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
> Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
>>> Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Android 16 is the current version so it's possible the OneNote doesn't
>>>>>>>> support 13.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 15 is  the newest release version, 16 is still in development.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> According to wikipedia it was released this month.
>>>>> You clearly didn't read even the first paragraph
>>>>> 
>>>>> "Android 16 is the upcoming major release of Android. The first 
>>>>> developer preview was released on November 19, 2024. Google expects the 
>>>>> platform to reach beta stage in January 2025 with a final release 
>>>>> expected in the second quarter of 2025."
>>>> 
>>>> The table here states it was released on 18th December:
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_version_history
>>> 
>>> Nope, it doesn't.
>>> 
>>> The "December 18, 2024" date is followed by a *note* '[29]', which is
>>> - as always in Wikipedia - also a link.
>>> 
>>> If you follow that link, you will get the 'Release notes' which cleary
>>> says "Developer Preview 2", so exactly as Andy said "16 is still in
>>> development" and proven by his (above quouted) quote from the Wikipedia
>>> page.
>>> 
>>> 'Release notes'
>>> <https://developer.android.com/about/versions/16/release-notes>
>> 
>> Then the table is wrong. I was simply doing a quick internet search to help
>> the OP. 
> 
>   That you can't be bothered to read for comprehension and follow links,
> doesn't mean the table is wrong. See also Jörg comment about the colour
> coding in the table.
> 
>>> Of course all of this should have been blatantly obvious, as Android
>>> *15* was only released little over 3 months earlier. New Android
>>> versions come (too) quickly, but not *that* quickly.
>> 
>> I don't use android, so not up to speed, hence why I thought wikipedia was
>> accurate. 
> 
>   Huh? Then why do you subscribe to this group and say (to Jörg) "It
> isn't on my phone?". And once more, Wikipedia *is* accurate (on this
> issue).
> 
>   That you overlooked the note, etc. is of course perfectly allright.
> Being flippant when people correct you, not so much.

How am I being flippant? I acknowledged the mistake.

Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-23 17:11 -0700
  Re: One Note Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2024-12-24 04:56 +0000
    Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-24 08:41 -0700
      Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-24 08:49 -0700
        Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-24 09:03 -0700
      Re: One Note Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2024-12-24 17:26 +0000
        Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-25 11:03 -0700
          Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-25 12:02 -0700
            Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-30 09:23 -0700
          Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-25 23:28 +0000
            Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-26 10:40 -0700
              Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 11:44 +0000
                Re: One Note Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2024-12-28 09:07 -0700
                Re: One Note Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-28 16:42 +0000
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 01:44 +0000
                Re: One Note Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2024-12-29 03:41 +0100
                Re: One Note Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-29 10:14 +0000
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 18:29 +0000
                Re: One Note Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-29 18:35 +0000
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 08:24 +0000
                Re: One Note Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-12-29 19:15 +0000
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 08:24 +0000
                Re: One Note Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-12-30 11:13 +0000
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 21:47 +0000
                Re: One Note Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-12-31 22:07 +0000
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 16:26 +0000
                Re: One Note Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-01 16:52 +0000
                Re: One Note Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2024-12-30 03:36 +0100
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 08:24 +0000
                Re: One Note Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> - 2024-12-30 12:00 +0100
                Re: One Note Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 16:14 +0000
                Re: One Note Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-12-31 00:18 +0100
                Re: One Note Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2024-12-31 00:17 +0100

csiph-web