Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #456606
| From | Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: A GOOD QUESTION |
| Date | 2018-04-21 19:38 -0500 |
| Organization | National Lawnchair Registry |
| Message-ID | <trlndd52bn1ed64a43kvhejg059spslo7b@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <NtQuC.340490$_J4.75944@fx28.am4> <dc7ffe3a-9768-4f84-80c7-afd421b3c24b@googlegroups.com> <f4e4291a-1ba7-4a98-8fda-ad0cdeb75076@googlegroups.com> <ok2ldd13mpntvtfar68qmbqdg2kpo8lqcm@4ax.com> <e75d14fa-5d1a-4738-883b-5f9afc911f5e@googlegroups.com> |
On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 12:32:46 -0700 (PDT), RichD wrote: >On April 20, Lofty Goat wrote: >> > How do we know the sun isn't the center of the universe, with >> > everything flying off in every direction? >> >> That is exactly correct. >> >> Moreover, the statement is correct for *every locale*, including the >> Sun. Every point in the universe is its center, and every other point >> in the universe is receding from the center. > >Prove it. > >Note (read slowly, concentrate hard): >'prove' does not mean "I have a model, which conforms to >observations, therefore it's correct, THE model, all others fail" > >'prove' means "That other model - "the sun is THE center" - >has been falsified, here is the evidence: ...... " You're right. In science "prove" means that "I have a model which makes verifiable predictions of the outcomes of experiments." Conforming to observations is useful, but if you can't devise a new experiment and then use the model to predict its outcome to within some known tolerance, then it isn't a useful model. And no models are perfect insofar as they predict the outcome of *all* experiments no matter how extreme the conditions. When one passes that boundary, it is the job of science to devise a better model. That said, given the most useful model we have of how the universe behaves, the Sun is at its exact center, as is everything else. -- Goat
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A GOOD QUESTION Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 18:42 +0100
A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-28 10:50 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 19:07 +0100
A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-28 11:23 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 12:25 -0700
A GOOD QUESTION Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 12:27 -0700
A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-28 12:52 -0700
A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-28 12:57 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 13:45 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-28 14:39 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-20 16:44 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-20 17:13 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-20 17:21 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 20:00 -0500
Re: A GOOD QUESTION RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-21 12:32 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-21 12:41 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-04-21 19:28 -0500
Re: A GOOD QUESTION mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-04-21 21:49 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION HGW <HW@home.net> - 2018-04-23 08:14 +1000
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-22 16:40 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-04-23 01:53 +0200
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 09:45 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Erálnì Histickému <no@ovmwk.gn> - 2018-04-22 08:06 +0000
Re: A GOOD QUESTION HGW <HW@home.net> - 2018-04-23 08:12 +1000
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 19:38 -0500
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-04-22 09:04 -0500
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Erálnì Histickému <no@ovmwk.gn> - 2018-04-22 14:55 +0000
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 12:03 -0500
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Erálnì Histickému <no@ovmwk.gn> - 2018-04-23 16:29 +0000
Re: A GOOD QUESTION kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-05-13 08:15 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 18:47 +0000
Re: A GOOD QUESTION kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-05-14 07:56 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 16:47 +0000
Re: A GOOD QUESTION kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-05-14 14:59 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 22:24 +0000
Re: A GOOD QUESTION RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-16 10:35 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 18:32 +0000
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-05-16 18:52 -0500
Re: A GOOD QUESTION kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-05-17 10:01 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 17:44 +0000
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Ursula Vankeuren <aln@divweo.id> - 2018-05-19 14:07 +0000
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-03-31 18:42 -0500
Re: A GOOD QUESTION HGW <HW@home.net> - 2018-04-20 09:12 +1000
Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-19 17:53 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-19 17:54 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-19 21:16 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION HGW <HW@home.net> - 2018-04-21 07:36 +1000
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-20 14:58 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 20:00 -0500
Re: A GOOD QUESTION benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-20 21:39 -0400
Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-20 19:02 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-20 19:16 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-20 19:20 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-20 19:32 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-20 19:47 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-20 20:03 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-20 20:39 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION HGW <HW@home.net> - 2018-04-23 07:52 +1000
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-22 16:39 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION HGW <HW@home.net> - 2018-04-25 12:25 +1000
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-24 20:34 -0700
Re: A GOOD QUESTION Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 09:01 +0100
Re: A GOOD QUESTION paul jark <jarkpaulsmith@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 06:27 -0700
csiph-web