Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #456606

Re: A GOOD QUESTION

From Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: A GOOD QUESTION
Date 2018-04-21 19:38 -0500
Organization National Lawnchair Registry
Message-ID <trlndd52bn1ed64a43kvhejg059spslo7b@4ax.com> (permalink)
References <NtQuC.340490$_J4.75944@fx28.am4> <dc7ffe3a-9768-4f84-80c7-afd421b3c24b@googlegroups.com> <f4e4291a-1ba7-4a98-8fda-ad0cdeb75076@googlegroups.com> <ok2ldd13mpntvtfar68qmbqdg2kpo8lqcm@4ax.com> <e75d14fa-5d1a-4738-883b-5f9afc911f5e@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 12:32:46 -0700 (PDT), RichD wrote:

>On April 20, Lofty Goat wrote:
>> > How do we know the sun isn't the center of the universe, with
>> > everything flying off in every direction?
>> 
>> That is exactly correct.
>> 
>> Moreover, the statement is correct for *every locale*, including the
>> Sun.  Every point in the universe is its center, and every other point
>> in the universe is receding from the center.
> 
>Prove it.
>
>Note (read slowly, concentrate hard): 
>'prove' does not mean "I have a model, which conforms to 
>observations, therefore it's correct, THE model, all others fail"
>
>'prove' means "That other model -  "the sun is THE center" - 
>has been falsified, here is the evidence: ...... "

You're right.  In science "prove" means that "I have a model which makes
verifiable predictions of the outcomes of experiments."

Conforming to observations is useful, but if you can't devise a new
experiment and then use the model to predict its outcome to within some
known tolerance, then it isn't a useful model.

And no models are perfect insofar as they predict the outcome of *all*
experiments no matter how extreme the conditions.  When one passes that
boundary, it is the job of science to devise a better model.

That said, given the most useful model we have of how the universe
behaves, the Sun is at its exact center, as is everything else.

-- 
Goat

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

A GOOD QUESTION Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 18:42 +0100
  A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-28 10:50 -0700
    Re: A GOOD QUESTION Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 19:07 +0100
  A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-28 11:23 -0700
  Re: A GOOD QUESTION Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 12:25 -0700
  A GOOD QUESTION Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 12:27 -0700
    A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-28 12:52 -0700
      A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-28 12:57 -0700
    Re: A GOOD QUESTION Koobee Wublee <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 13:45 -0700
      Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-03-28 14:39 -0700
    Re: A GOOD QUESTION RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-20 16:44 -0700
      Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-20 17:13 -0700
        Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-20 17:21 -0700
      Re: A GOOD QUESTION Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 20:00 -0500
        Re: A GOOD QUESTION RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-21 12:32 -0700
          Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-21 12:41 -0700
          Re: A GOOD QUESTION Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-04-21 19:28 -0500
            Re: A GOOD QUESTION mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-04-21 21:49 -0700
              Re: A GOOD QUESTION HGW <HW@home.net> - 2018-04-23 08:14 +1000
                Re: A GOOD QUESTION Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-22 16:40 -0700
                Re: A GOOD QUESTION Python <python@python.invalid> - 2018-04-23 01:53 +0200
                Re: A GOOD QUESTION Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 09:45 -0700
            Re: A GOOD QUESTION Erálnì Histickému <no@ovmwk.gn> - 2018-04-22 08:06 +0000
            Re: A GOOD QUESTION HGW <HW@home.net> - 2018-04-23 08:12 +1000
          Re: A GOOD QUESTION Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 19:38 -0500
            Re: A GOOD QUESTION Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-04-22 09:04 -0500
              Re: A GOOD QUESTION Erálnì Histickému <no@ovmwk.gn> - 2018-04-22 14:55 +0000
              Re: A GOOD QUESTION Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-22 12:03 -0500
                Re: A GOOD QUESTION Erálnì Histickému <no@ovmwk.gn> - 2018-04-23 16:29 +0000
    Re: A GOOD QUESTION kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-05-13 08:15 -0700
      Re: A GOOD QUESTION Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 18:47 +0000
        Re: A GOOD QUESTION kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-05-14 07:56 -0700
          Re: A GOOD QUESTION Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 16:47 +0000
            Re: A GOOD QUESTION kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-05-14 14:59 -0700
              Re: A GOOD QUESTION Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 22:24 +0000
        Re: A GOOD QUESTION RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-16 10:35 -0700
          Re: A GOOD QUESTION Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 18:32 +0000
          Re: A GOOD QUESTION Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-05-16 18:52 -0500
    Re: A GOOD QUESTION kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2018-05-17 10:01 -0700
      Re: A GOOD QUESTION Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 17:44 +0000
        Re: A GOOD QUESTION Ursula Vankeuren <aln@divweo.id> - 2018-05-19 14:07 +0000
  Re: A GOOD QUESTION Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-03-31 18:42 -0500
    Re: A GOOD QUESTION HGW <HW@home.net> - 2018-04-20 09:12 +1000
      Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-19 17:53 -0700
      Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-19 17:54 -0700
      Re: A GOOD QUESTION Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-19 21:16 -0700
        Re: A GOOD QUESTION HGW <HW@home.net> - 2018-04-21 07:36 +1000
          Re: A GOOD QUESTION Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-20 14:58 -0700
            Re: A GOOD QUESTION Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 20:00 -0500
              Re: A GOOD QUESTION benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-20 21:39 -0400
                Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-20 19:02 -0700
                Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-20 19:16 -0700
                Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-20 19:20 -0700
                Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-20 19:32 -0700
                Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-20 19:47 -0700
                Re: A GOOD QUESTION "David (Kronos Prime) Fuller" <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-20 20:03 -0700
              Re: A GOOD QUESTION Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-20 20:39 -0700
            Re: A GOOD QUESTION HGW <HW@home.net> - 2018-04-23 07:52 +1000
              Re: A GOOD QUESTION Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-22 16:39 -0700
                Re: A GOOD QUESTION HGW <HW@home.net> - 2018-04-25 12:25 +1000
                Re: A GOOD QUESTION Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-24 20:34 -0700
  Re: A GOOD QUESTION Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 09:01 +0100
  Re: A GOOD QUESTION paul jark <jarkpaulsmith@gmail.com> - 2018-05-19 06:27 -0700

csiph-web