Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Carlo XYZ <carloxyz@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | ger.ct |
| Subject | Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. |
| Date | 2022-09-11 12:30 +0200 |
| Organization | ABC |
| Message-ID | <tfkdd0$1snnt$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <6a0f5dff-5ab4-4d09-bfc1-b2e46542d4dfn@googlegroups.com> <tfd6nj$p3u1$1@dont-email.me> <1k142zzudlaqw$.1hvw5q4e4yv90$.dlg@40tude.net> <jo1i9uFlo3oU1@mid.individual.net> <e3e1422d-f2e5-4061-a8d3-19229162cd8fn@googlegroups.com> |
Ulf Kutzner schrieb am 11.09.22 um 10:55: > Michael Bode schrieb am Freitag, 9. September 2022 um 21:25:51 UTC+2: >> Frank Hucklenbroich <huckle...@gmx.net> writes: >>> Gestern sagte jemand im Fernsehen, sie war Königin unter Winston Churchill, >>> der 1875 geboren wurde, und unter Liz Truss, Jahrgang 1975. > >> Unter? Das bezweifle ich. > > Die Sache ist ambivalent. Man schaue sich > an, wer im Vereinigten Königreich die Thronreden > schreibt bzw. vorlegt. Hierzulande schwer vorstellbar, aber das zementiert die Hierarchie. Die königliche Familie vertraut darauf, dass das Dienstpersonal (zwei Abteilungen) sich um die Tagespolitik derart kümmert, dass sie (die Familie) ungestört den wirklich wichtigen Beschäftigungen nachgehen kann: Reiten, jagen, saufen, Untertatenköpfe tätscheln, und was dergleichen mehr ist. (Reden schreiben gehört nicht dazu.)
Back to ger.ct | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-08 09:42 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-08 17:54 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-08 10:17 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Georg Gruber <g.gruber_hauwech@gmx.net> - 2022-09-08 19:41 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-08 10:55 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-08 11:08 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Johannes Leckebusch <jlnospam@johannes-leckebusch.de> - 2022-09-08 20:10 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ned Kelly <ned.kelly@nefkom.net> - 2022-09-08 21:41 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Georg Gruber <g.gruber_hauwech@gmx.net> - 2022-09-08 20:17 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Johannes Leckebusch <jlnospam@johannes-leckebusch.de> - 2022-09-08 20:24 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-08 23:19 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Frank Hucklenbroich <hucklenbroich@gmx.net> - 2022-09-09 20:51 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-09-09 21:25 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-11 01:55 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2022-09-11 09:51 +0000
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-09-11 12:28 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-11 14:46 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-11 14:09 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> - 2022-09-11 15:14 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-11 18:46 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Zink <michael@swamp.franken.de> - 2022-09-12 09:46 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-11 09:22 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Stefan+Usenet@Froehlich.Priv.at (Stefan Froehlich) - 2022-09-12 19:51 +0000
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Herwig <herwig.huener@t-online.de> - 2022-09-13 04:26 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Carlo XYZ <carloxyz@invalid.invalid> - 2022-09-11 12:30 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-11 04:05 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-11 18:44 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulf Kutzner <Ulf.Kutzner@web.de> - 2022-09-11 09:50 -0700
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-11 18:02 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-12 19:53 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-12 19:44 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-13 11:53 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Goetz Schultz <news.expire1225@goetz.co.uk> - 2022-09-13 11:27 +0100
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Michael Zink <michael@swamp.franken.de> - 2022-09-12 10:03 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2022-09-12 19:53 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ruediger Lahl <ruediger.lahl@gmx.de> - 2022-09-10 00:45 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulrich Weise <ulrich.weise@t-online.de> - 2022-09-10 17:47 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Lars Gebauer <lgebauer@live.de> - 2022-09-10 19:13 +0200
Re: Elizabeth II: Growing old is not for Sissies. Ulrich Weise <ulrich.weise@t-online.de> - 2022-09-10 17:52 +0200
csiph-web