Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #85910
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: initializer list type deduction rules |
| Date | 2022-08-13 18:14 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <td8ils$2s7dh$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <tcvppt$18ns$1@gioia.aioe.org> <c353b6c3-b434-40df-97b1-44484c668958n@googlegroups.com> <td52rd$7pi$1@gioia.aioe.org> <72e2232b-d54f-4bf9-b6e9-9d8a76ff1489n@googlegroups.com> <mUtJK.758967$ssF.480844@fx14.iad> |
On 12/08/2022 16:58, Scott Lurndal wrote: > =?UTF-8?B?w5bDtiBUaWli?= <ootiib@hot.ee> writes: >> On Friday, 12 August 2022 at 11:26:37 UTC+3, Mut...@dastardlyhq.com wrote: > >>>> OK ... then use CLion, works fine on Linux ... I think it was less than >>>> $200/year. >>> Using command line tools is $0 a year. >> >> Decent engineer costs about $200K/year so it is pointless to save 0.1% >> of it and then waste her time with inadequate tools. > > Inadequate is in the eye of the beholder, of course. Operating system > developers, for example, don't generally use IDEs, at least in my CPOE. > > It also is highly dependent upon the age of the developer, with older > developers often eschewing IDEs for various reasons. For me, they are > not as productive as command line tools. If you make sure your code can be built from command-line tools (make, or whatever alternative you prefer), then developers can use whatever mixture they find most convenient. When working seriously on a project, I'll usually use Eclipse - not because it is in some objective sense the "best" IDE, but because it is good enough and I'm familiar with it. Other people working on the same code base use MS Visual Studio (or is that Visual Studio Code? I always mix these), from personal preference and familiarity. Sometimes I'll use a lighter editor like GEdit or Notepad++, for small changes without having to start a big IDE. Sometimes I'll use nano. If I want to search in the code, I might use the IDE's search, or I might use grep. Some stuff I'll do on Linux, some on Windows - as will other developers in the team, who have different preferences. There's no reason to pick just /one/ tool or toolset - use whatever mixture suits best for the task and the person working on the task.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
initializer list type deduction rules Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-08-09 07:54 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2022-08-09 10:43 +0200
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-09 09:00 -0700
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-09 16:06 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-08-10 02:32 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-08-10 09:11 +0300
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-08-10 06:57 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-10 07:31 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-10 00:40 -0700
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-10 07:55 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-10 01:13 -0700
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-10 08:21 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-10 11:13 -0700
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-12 08:26 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-12 03:38 -0700
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-12 10:48 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-12 04:54 -0700
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-12 14:34 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-12 08:34 -0700
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-12 15:57 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-12 09:16 -0700
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-13 09:35 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-13 09:44 -0700
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-14 11:12 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-08-12 14:58 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-12 08:59 -0700
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-12 16:11 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-08-12 16:44 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-12 12:08 -0700
Re: initializer list type deduction rules scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-08-12 19:58 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-12 16:42 -0700
Re: initializer list type deduction rules David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-08-13 18:14 +0200
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-14 11:06 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-08-15 11:34 +0200
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-15 19:03 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-08-15 21:23 +0200
Re: initializer list type deduction rules red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2022-08-15 13:51 -0700
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-16 19:16 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-08-21 22:23 +0300
Re: initializer list type deduction rules David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-08-22 08:08 +0200
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-08-22 11:37 +0300
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-22 10:23 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-08-11 06:24 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-08-11 16:37 +0100
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-08-11 20:12 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-08-12 00:09 +0100
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-08-12 11:51 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-12 08:29 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-08-12 12:08 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-12 14:37 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-08-12 15:01 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-08-15 06:04 +0000
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-08-09 16:08 -0700
Re: initializer list type deduction rules Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-08-10 02:34 +0000
csiph-web