Re: initializer list type deduction rules

From	Muttley@dastardlyhq.com
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c++
Subject	Re: initializer list type deduction rules
Date	2022-08-12 15:57 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<td5ta3$1dli$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(9 earlier) <72e2232b-d54f-4bf9-b6e9-9d8a76ff1489n@googlegroups.com> <td5b51$1mtd$1@gioia.aioe.org> <4779f0d4-e6a8-4f08-8bf9-67563de04faan@googlegroups.com> <td5odj$15dk$1@gioia.aioe.org> <d79b17a1-969a-419e-aa07-aeac9863874dn@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 08:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
=?UTF-8?B?w5bDtiBUaWli?= <ootiib@hot.ee> wrote:
>On Friday, 12 August 2022 at 17:34:46 UTC+3, Mut...@dastardlyhq.com wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 04:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
>> >You did not explain how you would extend typedef to define alias templates.
>> I've already asked if there's something magical about the word "using". 
>> 
>> typedef <var> = 
>> 
>> could use a different syntax to normal typedef but at least it would be the 
>> same keyword.
>
>Someone could indeed do something even far more confusing and so you
>would bitch about that here. It was passable what they did.

Why would it be far more confusing that using a totally inappropriate keyword?
Or do you think "using" is a synonym for define? If so you should have a word
with your english teacher.

>> Which is your usual opinion if you disagree with someone. Like a lot of
>people 
>> on this group you seem to believe your opinion is the only correct one.
>
>You have by now proven that you can't come out with grammar for
>type alias template also you can't give any links to any proposals by others
>so just a warm air.

Clearly reading is not your strongpoint. Should I google translate stuff into
estonian just for you?

>> It writing in fucking java so you can shove that POS where the sun doesn't 
>> shine. I don't need an IDE using gigabytes of memory just to edit and
>compile. 
>> I could use Eclipse for that. 
>
>RAM is like $10 per gigabyte, why you keep constantly discussing things that
>do not matter? That memory is not part of bill of material of product but
>developer workstation.

"developer workstation"? You've heard of dev servers right? And they're not
just hosting one user. Oh sorry Mr Windows dev, multiuser is a novel concept 
for people like you.

>> Also in a previous job I had to remote debug embedded linux systems running 
>> on a low powered ARM with < 50M of memory. Let me know how I'd have done
>that 
>> using clion.
>
>What madness you are talking about? Remote debugging worked fine already
>in eighties with thousand times less memory and who puts source code onto
>embedded system to grep it there? 

face <- palm.

>> >All that is rarely needed as most actual development goes using 
>> >distributed code repositories (free are market leaders) and continuous
>> LOL :) Oh you really don't have a clue do you Mr Desktop developer.
>
>Giggling madly? Feel free to express whatever weird ideas about my work,

See above :) You really have no clue. Go back to Visual Studio.

Thread

initializer list type deduction rules Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-08-09 07:54 +0000
  Re: initializer list type deduction rules Bo Persson <bo@bo-persson.se> - 2022-08-09 10:43 +0200
  Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-09 09:00 -0700
    Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-09 16:06 +0000
      Re: initializer list type deduction rules Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-08-10 02:32 +0000
        Re: initializer list type deduction rules Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-08-10 09:11 +0300
          Re: initializer list type deduction rules Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-08-10 06:57 +0000
        Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-10 07:31 +0000
      Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-10 00:40 -0700
        Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-10 07:55 +0000
          Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-10 01:13 -0700
            Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-10 08:21 +0000
              Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-10 11:13 -0700
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-12 08:26 +0000
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-12 03:38 -0700
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-12 10:48 +0000
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-12 04:54 -0700
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-12 14:34 +0000
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-12 08:34 -0700
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-12 15:57 +0000
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-12 09:16 -0700
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-13 09:35 +0000
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-13 09:44 -0700
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-14 11:12 +0000
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-08-12 14:58 +0000
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-12 08:59 -0700
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-12 16:11 +0000
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-08-12 16:44 +0000
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-12 12:08 -0700
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-08-12 19:58 +0000
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-08-12 16:42 -0700
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-08-13 18:14 +0200
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-14 11:06 +0000
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-08-15 11:34 +0200
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-15 19:03 +0000
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-08-15 21:23 +0200
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2022-08-15 13:51 -0700
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-16 19:16 +0000
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-08-21 22:23 +0300
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-08-22 08:08 +0200
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2022-08-22 11:37 +0300
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-22 10:23 +0000
          Re: initializer list type deduction rules Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-08-11 06:24 +0000
            Re: initializer list type deduction rules Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-08-11 16:37 +0100
              Re: initializer list type deduction rules Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-08-11 20:12 +0000
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-08-12 00:09 +0100
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-08-12 11:51 +0000
            Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-12 08:29 +0000
              Re: initializer list type deduction rules Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-08-12 12:08 +0000
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2022-08-12 14:37 +0000
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-08-12 15:01 +0000
                Re: initializer list type deduction rules Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-08-15 06:04 +0000
  Re: initializer list type deduction rules Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2022-08-09 16:08 -0700
    Re: initializer list type deduction rules Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2022-08-10 02:34 +0000

csiph-web