Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #449491

Re: Possibly good?

From owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Possibly good?
Date 2018-04-29 14:27 +0000
Organization O.W.L.
Message-ID <szcv9080g3.gvbhu@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <fkkb9qFo95vU3@mid.individual.net> <z9b008ba.aho3@rooftop.invalid> <fkkd3sFom7jU2@mid.individual.net> <szx9bv0z.faeu@rooftop.invalid> <fkkf6dFp263U2@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 4/28/18 4:21 PM, owl wrote:
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 4/28/18 3:56 PM, owl wrote:
>>> ...
>>>>>>> Not a scientific site and their anti-science claims are trivially easy
>>>>>>> to debunk. For example, they lie about the number of scientists who
>>>>>>> disagree with the consensus and push the insane straw man about the
>>>>>>> climate always changing as if someone suggested otherwise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They are not "pushing" anything.  They present arguments for both sides of
>>>>>> issues.  That's why it's called procon.org.  Climate change is just one of them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fair enough: I mean they were presenting the anti-science agenda that
>>>>> others push, even though it is clearly not tied to evidence or reason.
>>>>
>>>> Climate "science" is heavily political.  The same can be said for much
>>>> of "science" in general.  Whenever big money is involved (as it is in
>>>> pretty much all aspects of science), agendas get pushed for profit.
>>>> Just because the people on "the other side" have a financial stake,
>>>> don't think for minute that the people on "your side" aren't similarly
>>>> motivated.
>>>
>>> The science is backed by scientists of different political views from
>>> different countries and different funding sources. The DENIAL of the
>>> science is political (the goal being to socialize the costs and risks of
>>> using ancient stores of carbon).
>>>
>> 
>> The junk science is also rejected by scientists who are not dependent
>> on those in charge of the dogma.
> 
> I am sincere in saying it you want to learn about the science you should 
> go to a scientific site. Seriously, I would love to see you be able to 
> talk intelligently about this.
> 

You are brainwashed, and the sum of your education on this matter comes
from 30-minute television shows.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Possibly good? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-26 11:49 -0700
  Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 12:28 -0700
  Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-26 22:24 +0000
    Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 15:38 -0700
      Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 21:47 -0700
    Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 15:51 -0700
      Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 00:39 -0700
  Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-26 23:32 +0000
    Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 03:45 -0700
  Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-27 11:03 -0500
    Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-27 22:03 +0000
      Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-27 17:28 -0700
        Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 11:01 -0400
          Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 08:52 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 16:01 +0000
              Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 12:43 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 09:56 -0700
              Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 09:48 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 19:08 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 13:00 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 16:23 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 13:36 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 20:59 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:11 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 22:33 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 15:35 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 22:56 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:06 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 23:21 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:42 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 14:27 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 10:26 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-29 19:27 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 16:54 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 19:41 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 20:56 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:07 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 22:06 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 15:30 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 22:43 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:07 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 23:17 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:42 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 00:58 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 18:22 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 01:37 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 18:44 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 01:53 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 19:06 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 02:16 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 19:30 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 02:44 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 19:46 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 02:54 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 20:00 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 03:03 +0000
                Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-04-29 04:44 -0700
                Re: Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 05:13 -0700
                Re: Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-29 19:21 -0400
                Re: Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 16:54 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 17:11 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:18 -0700
              Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-29 09:42 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 14:21 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 07:34 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-29 10:43 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 15:28 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-29 13:13 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 17:37 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 10:44 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 08:15 -0500
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 06:36 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-29 15:29 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 15:43 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-29 16:05 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 16:44 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-29 17:40 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 17:58 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-29 19:24 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 12:43 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 20:26 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 13:46 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 20:24 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 14:05 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 09:23 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 12:27 -0400
          Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-04-28 17:24 +0000
            Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 13:44 -0400
              Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 10:54 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 10:56 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-04-28 21:01 +0200
              Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 12:59 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 20:51 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 13:57 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 21:04 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 17:13 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:17 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:37 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:41 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 01:21 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 17:09 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:12 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:36 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:40 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-01 09:26 +0200
              Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-28 23:13 -0700
              Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 08:19 -0500
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 08:04 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:38 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:42 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-01 09:24 +0200
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 05:34 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 02:53 -0700
              Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:34 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:39 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-01 09:20 +0200
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 05:37 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 11:11 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 15:17 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 19:47 -0400
          Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-29 09:40 -0400
            Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 07:03 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 10:26 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 08:03 -0500
              Re: Possibly good? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2018-04-30 14:14 +0100
              Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:44 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 04:43 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 05:28 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 05:36 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 06:09 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 07:12 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-01 14:52 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 14:56 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-01 15:01 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-01 07:01 -0500
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 11:21 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 08:31 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 19:41 -0400
      Re: Possibly good? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 18:29 -0700

csiph-web