Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #449430

Re: Possibly good?

From owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Possibly good?
Date 2018-04-28 22:56 +0000
Organization O.W.L.
Message-ID <z9b008ba.aho3@rooftop.invalid> (permalink)
References (8 earlier) <fkk49jFmqt0U1@mid.individual.net> <z90z80bw.baho3@rooftop.invalid> <fkk6b5Fn9vpU1@mid.individual.net> <zxcb03.agnui4@rooftop.invalid> <fkkb9qFo95vU3@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 4/28/18 3:33 PM, owl wrote:
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 4/28/18 1:59 PM, owl wrote:
>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 4/28/18 1:23 PM, a.m wrote:
>>>>>>>> If you truly want to learn about man-made global climate change go to
>>>>>>>> any -- literally ANY -- scientific site that states a position. Follow
>>>>>>>> some of their references to learn more.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would love to see Antarctica uncovered in my lifetime, and I couldn't
>>>>>>> care less about Florida.  Let that shit sink.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes owl, make sure you go to_ANY_  scientific site that states a
>>>>>> position but makes sure that it states whatever position the Prescott
>>>>>> cockroach agrees with otherwise go to any_OTHER_  scientific site and
>>>>>> do the same. If you can't find one that agrees with Michael Glasser,
>>>>>> make sure that you ask him to send you his pre-approved list of_ANY_
>>>>>> scientific site.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am speaking of ANY scientific site. ANY scientific organization. ANY.
>>>>> Not some group that formed to try to debunk science, but any
>>>>> science-focused organization.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have NO leg to stand on here. I am talking fact... you are whining
>>>>> that facts are "biased".
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Believe the Discovery Channel University if you want.
>>>> https://climatechange.procon.org/
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not a scientific site and their anti-science claims are trivially easy
>>> to debunk. For example, they lie about the number of scientists who
>>> disagree with the consensus and push the insane straw man about the
>>> climate always changing as if someone suggested otherwise.
>> 
>> They are not "pushing" anything.  They present arguments for both sides of
>> issues.  That's why it's called procon.org.  Climate change is just one of them.
> 
> Fair enough: I mean they were presenting the anti-science agenda that 
> others push, even though it is clearly not tied to evidence or reason.
> 

Climate "science" is heavily political.  The same can be said for much
of "science" in general.  Whenever big money is involved (as it is in
pretty much all aspects of science), agendas get pushed for profit.
Just because the people on "the other side" have a financial stake,
don't think for minute that the people on "your side" aren't similarly
motivated.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Possibly good? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-26 11:49 -0700
  Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 12:28 -0700
  Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-26 22:24 +0000
    Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 15:38 -0700
      Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 21:47 -0700
    Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 15:51 -0700
      Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 00:39 -0700
  Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-26 23:32 +0000
    Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 03:45 -0700
  Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-27 11:03 -0500
    Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-27 22:03 +0000
      Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-27 17:28 -0700
        Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 11:01 -0400
          Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 08:52 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 16:01 +0000
              Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 12:43 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 09:56 -0700
              Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 09:48 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 19:08 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 13:00 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 16:23 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 13:36 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 20:59 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:11 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 22:33 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 15:35 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 22:56 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:06 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 23:21 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:42 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 14:27 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 10:26 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-29 19:27 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 16:54 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 19:41 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 20:56 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:07 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 22:06 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 15:30 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 22:43 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:07 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 23:17 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:42 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 00:58 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 18:22 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 01:37 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 18:44 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 01:53 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 19:06 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 02:16 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 19:30 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 02:44 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 19:46 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 02:54 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 20:00 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 03:03 +0000
                Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-04-29 04:44 -0700
                Re: Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 05:13 -0700
                Re: Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-29 19:21 -0400
                Re: Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 16:54 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 17:11 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:18 -0700
              Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-29 09:42 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 14:21 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 07:34 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-29 10:43 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 15:28 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-29 13:13 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 17:37 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 10:44 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 08:15 -0500
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 06:36 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-29 15:29 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 15:43 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-29 16:05 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 16:44 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-29 17:40 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 17:58 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-29 19:24 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 12:43 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 20:26 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 13:46 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 20:24 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 14:05 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 09:23 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 12:27 -0400
          Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-04-28 17:24 +0000
            Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 13:44 -0400
              Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 10:54 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 10:56 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-04-28 21:01 +0200
              Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 12:59 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 20:51 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 13:57 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 21:04 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 17:13 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:17 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:37 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:41 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 01:21 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 17:09 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:12 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:36 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:40 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-01 09:26 +0200
              Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-28 23:13 -0700
              Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 08:19 -0500
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 08:04 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:38 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:42 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-01 09:24 +0200
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 05:34 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 02:53 -0700
              Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:34 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:39 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-01 09:20 +0200
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 05:37 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 11:11 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 15:17 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 19:47 -0400
          Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-29 09:40 -0400
            Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 07:03 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 10:26 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 08:03 -0500
              Re: Possibly good? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2018-04-30 14:14 +0100
              Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:44 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 04:43 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 05:28 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 05:36 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 06:09 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 07:12 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-01 14:52 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 14:56 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-01 15:01 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-01 07:01 -0500
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 11:21 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 08:31 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 19:41 -0400
      Re: Possibly good? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 18:29 -0700

csiph-web