Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #449445

Re: Possibly good?

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Possibly good?
Date 2018-04-28 16:42 -0700
Message-ID <fkkf6dFp263U2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (9 earlier) <zxcb03.agnui4@rooftop.invalid> <fkkb9qFo95vU3@mid.individual.net> <z9b008ba.aho3@rooftop.invalid> <fkkd3sFom7jU2@mid.individual.net> <szx9bv0z.faeu@rooftop.invalid>

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/28/18 4:21 PM, owl wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 4/28/18 3:56 PM, owl wrote:
>> ...
>>>>>> Not a scientific site and their anti-science claims are trivially easy
>>>>>> to debunk. For example, they lie about the number of scientists who
>>>>>> disagree with the consensus and push the insane straw man about the
>>>>>> climate always changing as if someone suggested otherwise.
>>>>>
>>>>> They are not "pushing" anything.  They present arguments for both sides of
>>>>> issues.  That's why it's called procon.org.  Climate change is just one of them.
>>>>
>>>> Fair enough: I mean they were presenting the anti-science agenda that
>>>> others push, even though it is clearly not tied to evidence or reason.
>>>
>>> Climate "science" is heavily political.  The same can be said for much
>>> of "science" in general.  Whenever big money is involved (as it is in
>>> pretty much all aspects of science), agendas get pushed for profit.
>>> Just because the people on "the other side" have a financial stake,
>>> don't think for minute that the people on "your side" aren't similarly
>>> motivated.
>>
>> The science is backed by scientists of different political views from
>> different countries and different funding sources. The DENIAL of the
>> science is political (the goal being to socialize the costs and risks of
>> using ancient stores of carbon).
>>
> 
> The junk science is also rejected by scientists who are not dependent
> on those in charge of the dogma.

I am sincere in saying it you want to learn about the science you should 
go to a scientific site. Seriously, I would love to see you be able to 
talk intelligently about this.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Possibly good? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-04-26 11:49 -0700
  Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 12:28 -0700
  Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-26 22:24 +0000
    Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 15:38 -0700
      Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 21:47 -0700
    Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 15:51 -0700
      Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 00:39 -0700
  Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-26 23:32 +0000
    Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 03:45 -0700
  Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-27 11:03 -0500
    Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-27 22:03 +0000
      Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-27 17:28 -0700
        Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 11:01 -0400
          Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 08:52 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 16:01 +0000
              Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 12:43 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 09:56 -0700
              Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 09:48 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 19:08 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 13:00 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 16:23 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 13:36 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 20:59 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:11 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 22:33 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 15:35 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 22:56 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:06 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 23:21 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:42 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 14:27 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 10:26 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-29 19:27 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 16:54 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 19:41 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 20:56 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:07 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 22:06 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 15:30 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 22:43 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:07 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 23:17 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 16:42 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 00:58 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 18:22 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 01:37 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 18:44 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 01:53 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 19:06 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 02:16 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 19:30 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 02:44 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 19:46 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 02:54 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 20:00 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-04-29 03:03 +0000
                Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-04-29 04:44 -0700
                Re: Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 05:13 -0700
                Re: Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-29 19:21 -0400
                Re: Our planet is greener now, vs. 100 years ago. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 16:54 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 17:11 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:18 -0700
              Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-29 09:42 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 14:21 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 07:34 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-29 10:43 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 15:28 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-29 13:13 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 17:37 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 10:44 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 08:15 -0500
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 06:36 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-29 15:29 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 15:43 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-29 16:05 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 16:44 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-29 17:40 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 17:58 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? "F. Russell" <fr@random.info> - 2018-04-29 19:24 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 12:43 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 20:26 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 13:46 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 20:24 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 14:05 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 09:23 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 12:27 -0400
          Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-04-28 17:24 +0000
            Re: Possibly good? a.m <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 13:44 -0400
              Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 10:54 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 10:56 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-04-28 21:01 +0200
              Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 12:59 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 20:51 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 13:57 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-28 21:04 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 17:13 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:17 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:37 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:41 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 01:21 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-28 17:09 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 14:12 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:36 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:40 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-01 09:26 +0200
              Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-28 23:13 -0700
              Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 08:19 -0500
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 08:04 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:38 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:42 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-01 09:24 +0200
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 05:34 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 02:53 -0700
              Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:34 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:39 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2018-05-01 09:20 +0200
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 05:37 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 11:11 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 15:17 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 19:47 -0400
          Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-29 09:40 -0400
            Re: Possibly good? Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 07:03 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 10:26 -0700
            Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 08:03 -0500
              Re: Possibly good? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2018-04-30 14:14 +0100
              Re: Possibly good? RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 03:44 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 04:43 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 05:28 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 05:36 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 06:09 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 07:12 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-01 14:52 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 14:56 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-01 15:01 +0000
                Re: Possibly good? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-01 07:01 -0500
                Re: Possibly good? Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 11:21 -0400
                Re: Possibly good? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 08:31 -0700
                Re: Possibly good? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 19:41 -0400
      Re: Possibly good? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 18:29 -0700

csiph-web