Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #4546
| From | Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? |
| Date | 2020-05-04 18:17 +0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <slrnrb0cg1.ca9.whynot@orphan.zombinet> (permalink) |
| References | <slrnramf8r.2f1.whynot@orphan.zombinet> <3cgung-kfm.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <slrnraracn.7cj.whynot@orphan.zombinet> <g3t2og-rvu.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> |
with <g3t2og-rvu.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 02/05/2020 19.10, Eric Pozharski wrote: >> with <3cgung-kfm.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> On 30/04/2020 23.03, Eric Pozharski wrote: *SKIP* > bind-9.11.2-lp151.11.6.1.x86_64 Well, this would be too much horse-power for me. -- Torvalds' goal for Linux is very simple: World Domination Stallman's goal for GNU is even simpler: Freedom
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-01 00:03 +0300
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-04-30 21:54 -0600
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-02 20:02 +0300
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-05-03 11:35 -0600
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2020-05-01 10:59 -0700
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-02 20:33 +0300
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2020-05-02 22:00 -0700
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? harri@kallio.tunk.org (Harri) - 2020-05-03 12:11 +0300
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2020-05-04 20:46 -0700
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-03 16:53 +0300
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2020-05-04 20:50 -0700
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-06 18:15 +0300
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-05-01 23:19 +0200
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-02 20:10 +0300
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-05-03 15:21 +0200
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-04 18:17 +0300
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-05-03 15:34 +0200
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-04 18:14 +0300
csiph-web