Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #4535

Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it?

From "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.networking
Subject Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it?
Date 2020-05-01 23:19 +0200
Message-ID <3cgung-kfm.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink)
References <slrnramf8r.2f1.whynot@orphan.zombinet>

Show all headers | View raw


On 30/04/2020 23.03, Eric Pozharski wrote:
> Context (because should give a chance to turn this in something utterly
> unralated):  slackware-current;  pdns-recursor (built from SBo, 4.1.13,
> might be important, almost master seems to be 4.3.0);  for reasons
> important for myself only going with zone-files.
> 
> First step:  setting up localhost.  Readings:
> 
> 23:22:20 162 [0:0] dig @127.0.0.1 localhost
> 
> ; <<>> DiG 9.16.1 <<>> @127.0.0.1 localhost
> ; (1 server found)
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 44337
> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
> 
> ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
> ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;localhost.                     IN      A
> 
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> localhost.              86400   IN      A       127.0.0.1
> 
> ;; Query time: 1 msec
> ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
> ;; WHEN: Thu Apr 30 23:22:36 UTC 2020
> ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 54
> 
> As you can see, answer is non-autoritative.  (Switching 'auth-zones' off
> and 'export-etc-hosts' on -- dead end, just in case;  didn't reach to a
> web-interface yet;  Summary:  I have options.)

cer@Telcontar:~> dig @127.0.0.1 localhost

; <<>> DiG 9.11.2 <<>> @127.0.0.1 localhost
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 46444
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 2

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
; COOKIE: 2b8f7eb5f9a06c8d044184135eac91664fe90669143f5c9f (good)
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;localhost.			IN	A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
localhost.		86400	IN	A	127.0.0.1

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
localhost.		86400	IN	NS	nimrodel.valinor.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
nimrodel.valinor.	86400	IN	A	192.168.1.12

;; Query time: 0 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
;; WHEN: Fri May 01 23:15:18 CEST 2020
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 128

cer@Telcontar:~> 


However, there is an error, it should be telcontar, not nimrodel. I just noticed.


-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-01 00:03 +0300
  Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-04-30 21:54 -0600
    Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-02 20:02 +0300
      Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-05-03 11:35 -0600
  Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2020-05-01 10:59 -0700
    Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-02 20:33 +0300
      Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2020-05-02 22:00 -0700
        Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? harri@kallio.tunk.org (Harri) - 2020-05-03 12:11 +0300
          Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2020-05-04 20:46 -0700
        Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-03 16:53 +0300
          Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2020-05-04 20:50 -0700
            Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-06 18:15 +0300
  Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-05-01 23:19 +0200
    Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-02 20:10 +0300
      Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-05-03 15:21 +0200
        Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-04 18:17 +0300
      Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-05-03 15:34 +0200
  Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-04 18:14 +0300

csiph-web