Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #4541

Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it?

From "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.networking
Subject Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it?
Date 2020-05-03 15:21 +0200
Message-ID <g3t2og-rvu.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink)
References <slrnramf8r.2f1.whynot@orphan.zombinet> <3cgung-kfm.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <slrnraracn.7cj.whynot@orphan.zombinet>

Show all headers | View raw


On 02/05/2020 19.10, Eric Pozharski wrote:
> with <3cgung-kfm.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> Carlos E.R. wrote:
>> On 30/04/2020 23.03, Eric Pozharski wrote:
> *SKIP*
>> cer@Telcontar:~> dig @127.0.0.1 localhost
> *SKIP*
>> ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 2
> *SKIP*
>> localhost.		86400	IN	NS	nimrodel.valinor.
> *SKIP*
>> However, there is an error, it should be telcontar, not nimrodel. I
>> just noticed.
> 
> Same output here (on a system I'm posting from, it's dying anyway).
> Except there's no nameserver on localhost thus it's expected.  BTW, just
> in case I'll need more options, what specific software is running on
> nimrodel?
> 

openSUSE 15.1

cer@Telcontar:~> rpm -qf /usr/sbin/named
bind-9.11.2-lp151.11.6.1.x86_64
cer@Telcontar:~>


-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-01 00:03 +0300
  Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-04-30 21:54 -0600
    Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-02 20:02 +0300
      Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-05-03 11:35 -0600
  Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2020-05-01 10:59 -0700
    Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-02 20:33 +0300
      Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2020-05-02 22:00 -0700
        Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? harri@kallio.tunk.org (Harri) - 2020-05-03 12:11 +0300
          Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2020-05-04 20:46 -0700
        Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-03 16:53 +0300
          Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2020-05-04 20:50 -0700
            Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-06 18:15 +0300
  Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-05-01 23:19 +0200
    Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-02 20:10 +0300
      Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-05-03 15:21 +0200
        Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-04 18:17 +0300
      Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-05-03 15:34 +0200
  Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-04 18:14 +0300

csiph-web