Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #4538
| From | Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? |
| Date | 2020-05-02 20:33 +0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <slrnrarbmt.7cj.whynot@orphan.zombinet> (permalink) |
| References | <slrnramf8r.2f1.whynot@orphan.zombinet> <r8ho17$8ki$1@dont-email.me> |
with <r8ho17$8ki$1@dont-email.me> Johann Beretta wrote: > On 4/30/20 2:03 PM, Eric Pozharski wrote: >> As you can see, answer is non-autoritative. (Switching 'auth-zones' >> off and 'export-etc-hosts' on -- dead end, just in case; didn't >> reach to a web-interface yet; Summary: I have options.) > Of course it is non-authoritative. You are not the official designee > for rDNS on the 127.0.0.0 block. You _can_ do rDNS on your own > system, but that is only valid locally. Yes, and it's intended behaviour. BTW, in defense of this abomination 'whois localhost' (and 'whois localhost.' too) refuses lookup at all. 'whois 127.0.0.1' doesn't serve anything reasonable either. So I figure 'localhost' is kindof free for grabs. *CUT* -- Torvalds' goal for Linux is very simple: World Domination Stallman's goal for GNU is even simpler: Freedom
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-01 00:03 +0300
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-04-30 21:54 -0600
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-02 20:02 +0300
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-05-03 11:35 -0600
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2020-05-01 10:59 -0700
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-02 20:33 +0300
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2020-05-02 22:00 -0700
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? harri@kallio.tunk.org (Harri) - 2020-05-03 12:11 +0300
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2020-05-04 20:46 -0700
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-03 16:53 +0300
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Johann Beretta <beretta@nun-ya-bizness.com> - 2020-05-04 20:50 -0700
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-06 18:15 +0300
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-05-01 23:19 +0200
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-02 20:10 +0300
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-05-03 15:21 +0200
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-04 18:17 +0300
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-05-03 15:34 +0200
Re: non-autoritative localhost, 1..12 sacle, how bad is it? Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2020-05-04 18:14 +0300
csiph-web