Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.ipad > #34916
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mobile.ipad, comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.freeware |
| Subject | Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? |
| Date | 2014-05-21 22:56 +0000 |
| Organization | Miskatonic U |
| Message-ID | <slrnlnqbom.2d5f.g.kreme@amelia.local> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <bu206qFu1U1@mid.individual.net> <llgl0h$2s8$1@dont-email.me> <bu27l5F1fncU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnlnod16.qo4.g.kreme@amelia.local> <bu4j6rFgqa7U1@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
In message <bu4j6rFgqa7U1@mid.individual.net>
Tommy <tommyleprechaun@yohoo.com> wrote:
> "Lewis" <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote in message
> news:slrnlnod16.qo4.g.kreme@amelia.local...
>> In message <bu27l5F1fncU1@mid.individual.net>
>> Tommy <tommyleprechaun@yohoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Its the idea that you can 'slather' on any foodstuffs that is the cause
>>> of
>>> obesity.
>>> Calorific intake is approx 2000 to 2500 for a normal person (male) -
>>> extreme
>>> exercising of course requires more - but those that take exercising to
>>> extremes will have a greater knowldge of what their intake and diet
>>> should
>>> be :-)
>>
>> None of this is correct at all. Calories are meaningless. You can eat
>> 10,000 calories a day and lose weight as long as none of those calories
>> come from carbohydrates.
> Thats great to know - I won't never again need to take in calories - you my
> man are a fscking genius {-))
Please learn to read for comprehension. This is something they should
have covered for you in 3rd grade.
--
All Hell hadn't been let loose. It was merely Detritus. But from a few
feet away you couldn't tell the difference.
Back to comp.mobile.ipad | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Pat Wilson <patwilson@example.com> - 2014-05-19 18:48 +0000
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? lew <citrustwosac@google.mailer.company.invalid> - 2014-05-19 20:46 +0000
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Neil Ellwood <niel.elllwood2@btinternet.com> - 2014-05-20 04:26 -0500
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Sally Thompson <sally.thompson000@gmail.com.invalid> - 2014-05-19 21:21 +0000
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? hummingbird <hummingbird@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-21 09:09 +0100
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-05-21 15:52 +0000
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? hummingbird <hummingbird@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-22 10:43 +0100
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-05-19 19:28 -0300
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-05-20 10:15 +0300
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2014-05-20 00:22 -0700
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Pat Wilson <patwilson@example.com> - 2014-05-20 07:36 +0000
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-20 03:55 -0400
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2014-05-20 05:22 -0700
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-05-20 13:54 -0300
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2014-05-20 18:22 +0100
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2014-05-20 13:32 -0400
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2014-05-20 18:58 +0100
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-05-20 15:20 -0300
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2014-05-20 20:26 +0100
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-20 20:47 +0000
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "Tommy" <tommyleprechaun@yohoo.com> - 2014-05-20 22:36 +0100
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2014-05-20 15:29 -0700
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "Tommy" <tommyleprechaun@yohoo.com> - 2014-05-21 00:43 +0100
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-21 05:05 +0000
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-21 04:43 -0400
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-05-21 08:08 -0300
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "Tommy" <tommyleprechaun@yohoo.com> - 2014-05-21 22:12 +0100
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-21 22:56 +0000
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "Tommy" <tommyleprechaun@yohoo.com> - 2014-05-22 00:04 +0100
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-21 19:27 -0400
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2014-05-21 20:25 -0400
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-21 05:04 +0000
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-21 04:43 -0400
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-05-20 19:19 -0300
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2014-05-21 00:47 +0100
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Spit the Cat <supersecret@IPaddress.invalid> - 2014-05-21 01:51 +0100
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2014-05-21 01:52 +0100
Re: [OT]Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-05-21 08:02 -0300
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> - 2014-05-21 13:01 +0100
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-21 05:13 +0000
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-05-20 15:17 +0100
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-20 10:34 -0400
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? hummingbird <hummingbird@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-22 09:29 +0100
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "Yes" <noone@invalid.invalid.com> - 2014-05-21 13:40 +0000
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Travis Bickle <3S96@taxi.net> - 2014-05-21 16:20 -0400
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-05-22 11:41 -0400
Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Jax <remove.bear.bottoms1@gmail.com> - 2014-05-26 21:17 +0100
csiph-web