Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net?

From	"Tommy" <tommyleprechaun@yohoo.com>
Newsgroups	comp.mobile.ipad, comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.freeware
Subject	Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net?
Date	2014-05-20 22:36 +0100
Organization	yahoo
Message-ID	<bu206qFu1U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<lldjma$o6t$1@dont-email.me> <vg3fvk4dipc.fsf@coffee.modeemi.fi> <llevs7$pfd$1@dont-email.me> <slrnlnnfrp.qo4.g.kreme@amelia.local>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"Lewis" <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote in message > In message 
<llevs7$pfd$1@dont-email.me>
>  mike <ham789@netzero.net> wrote:
>> On 5/20/2014 12:15 AM, Anssi Saari wrote:
>>> Pat Wilson <patwilson@example.com> writes:
>
>> Never eat anything that tastes good...that eliminates fat and sugar.
>> Do that and you will loose weight and not gain it back at the end of
>> your "diet".
>
> The human body has no mechanism to convert ingested fat into stored fat.
> Eating Fat does not make you fat.

Nope - its about sugar - its all about sugar :-)

Begin Quote:-
When you eat something sweet, your blood sugar levels increase too quickly, 
and your pancreas secretes the hormone insulin to take the excess sugar out 
of your blood.
Insulin is a fat storage hormone. It stores that extra sugar first as 
glycogen, and then as triglycerides (fat) once glycogen stores are full.

When insulin is activated, its partner hormone, glucagon, can’t operate. 
Glucagon’s job is to mobilize stored sugar back into the blood for energy 
use. These two hormones are constantly in a dance with each other and cannot 
be present in the blood at the same time.

So either your body is in an energy-burning/mobilizing state (glucagon) or 
your body is in an energy storage state (insulin).

Sugar mobilizes insulin; fat does not.
It’s that simple. In fact, the fat in a sweet treat will actually help to 
slow down that sugar spike, and thus reduce the insulin surge, mitigating 
some of the ill-effects of the sweet. This is why the whole fat-free dessert 
thing is such a bad idea. Not only are you mobilizing a ton of insulin, you’re 
also removing the one thing in there that could slow that process down.

Another piece to this puzzle is satiation. The digestion of fats triggers 
your satiation mechanism. This is why low-fat diets are doomed to fail and 
such an exercise in fierce willpower. Your body is never satisfied without 
fat, despite the number of calories (one more reason why calories aren’t the 
be all and end all).

It’s quite the opposite with sugar or foods converting to sugar quickly in 
the blood (starchy carbs like bread, pastas, cereal, potatoes, etc…). These 
foods inspire overeating and binging in part because they don’t satiate and 
in part because of the insulin reaction we explained above. After insulin 
has done its job of storing that extra sugar as fat, guess what happens? 
Your blood sugar takes a big hit and you now are in a low-blood sugar space. 
What do you crave now? You got it… more sugar.

This means: eating fat makes you fuller sooner and longer. Eating sugar 
leads to a sugar crash which makes you hungrier sooner and in a position to 
crave more sugar. A vicious cycle indeed.

End Quotes

Cheers
Tommy

Thread

Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Pat Wilson <patwilson@example.com> - 2014-05-19 18:48 +0000
  Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? lew <citrustwosac@google.mailer.company.invalid> - 2014-05-19 20:46 +0000
    Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Neil Ellwood <niel.elllwood2@btinternet.com> - 2014-05-20 04:26 -0500
  Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Sally Thompson <sally.thompson000@gmail.com.invalid> - 2014-05-19 21:21 +0000
    Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? hummingbird <hummingbird@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-21 09:09 +0100
      Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-05-21 15:52 +0000
        Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? hummingbird <hummingbird@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-22 10:43 +0100
  Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-05-19 19:28 -0300
  Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-05-20 10:15 +0300
    Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2014-05-20 00:22 -0700
      Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Pat Wilson <patwilson@example.com> - 2014-05-20 07:36 +0000
        Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-20 03:55 -0400
        Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2014-05-20 05:22 -0700
          Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-05-20 13:54 -0300
            Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2014-05-20 18:22 +0100
              Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2014-05-20 13:32 -0400
                Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2014-05-20 18:58 +0100
              Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-05-20 15:20 -0300
                Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2014-05-20 20:26 +0100
      Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-20 20:47 +0000
        Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "Tommy" <tommyleprechaun@yohoo.com> - 2014-05-20 22:36 +0100
          Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2014-05-20 15:29 -0700
            Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "Tommy" <tommyleprechaun@yohoo.com> - 2014-05-21 00:43 +0100
              Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-21 05:05 +0000
                Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-21 04:43 -0400
                Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-05-21 08:08 -0300
                Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "Tommy" <tommyleprechaun@yohoo.com> - 2014-05-21 22:12 +0100
                Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-21 22:56 +0000
                Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "Tommy" <tommyleprechaun@yohoo.com> - 2014-05-22 00:04 +0100
                Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-21 19:27 -0400
                Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2014-05-21 20:25 -0400
            Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-21 05:04 +0000
              Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-21 04:43 -0400
        Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-05-20 19:19 -0300
          Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2014-05-21 00:47 +0100
            Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Spit the Cat <supersecret@IPaddress.invalid> - 2014-05-21 01:51 +0100
              Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2014-05-21 01:52 +0100
                Re: [OT]Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-05-21 08:02 -0300
              Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> - 2014-05-21 13:01 +0100
          Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-21 05:13 +0000
  Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-05-20 15:17 +0100
    Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-20 10:34 -0400
    Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? hummingbird <hummingbird@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-22 09:29 +0100
  Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "Yes" <noone@invalid.invalid.com> - 2014-05-21 13:40 +0000
  Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Travis Bickle <3S96@taxi.net> - 2014-05-21 16:20 -0400
  Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-05-22 11:41 -0400
  Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Jax <remove.bear.bottoms1@gmail.com> - 2014-05-26 21:17 +0100

csiph-web