Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net?

From	Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies>
Newsgroups	comp.mobile.ipad, comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.freeware
Subject	Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net?
Date	2014-05-21 05:05 +0000
Organization	Miskatonic U
Message-ID	<slrnlnod16.qo4.g.kreme@amelia.local> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <llevs7$pfd$1@dont-email.me> <slrnlnnfrp.qo4.g.kreme@amelia.local> <bu206qFu1U1@mid.individual.net> <llgl0h$2s8$1@dont-email.me> <bu27l5F1fncU1@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In message <bu27l5F1fncU1@mid.individual.net> 
  Tommy <tommyleprechaun@yohoo.com> wrote:
> "mike" <ham789@netzero.net> wrote in message 
> news:llgl0h$2s8$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 5/20/2014 2:36 PM, Tommy wrote:
>>> "Lewis" <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote in message > In
>>> message <llevs7$pfd$1@dont-email.me>
>>>>  mike <ham789@netzero.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> This means: eating fat makes you fuller sooner and longer. Eating sugar
>>> leads to a sugar crash which makes you hungrier sooner and in a position
>>> to crave more sugar. A vicious cycle indeed.
>>>
>>> End Quotes
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Tommy
>> I have no basis to counter your statements, but it's counter to
>> what I believed.
>>
>> Taken literally, your statements suggest that I can slather on the
>> butter, sour cream, cheese, mayo, etc. and not gain weight.
>>
>> There must be more to the story.
>>
>> I still maintain that people who stuff their face until they're full
>> are gonna weigh more than those who don't.

> Yep, you are what you eat - stuff yourself all the time and thats what you 
> get -

> Exercise is good, but to exercise just to lose weight doesn't work.  I 
> maintain it (proper exercise) just helps the body to carry the weight a 
> little better.  Quite a few overweight folks have a glandular problem.  But 
> even they can be helped with proper diet :)

> Its the idea that you can 'slather' on any foodstuffs that is the cause of 
> obesity.
> Calorific intake is approx 2000 to 2500 for a normal person (male) - extreme 
> exercising of course requires more - but those that take exercising to 
> extremes will have a greater knowldge of what their intake and diet should 
> be :-)

None of this is correct at all. Calories are meaningless. You can eat
10,000 calories a day and lose weight as long as none of those calories
come from carbohydrates.

-- 
G is for GEORGE smothered under a rug
H is for HECTOR done in by a thug

Thread

Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Pat Wilson <patwilson@example.com> - 2014-05-19 18:48 +0000
  Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? lew <citrustwosac@google.mailer.company.invalid> - 2014-05-19 20:46 +0000
    Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Neil Ellwood <niel.elllwood2@btinternet.com> - 2014-05-20 04:26 -0500
  Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Sally Thompson <sally.thompson000@gmail.com.invalid> - 2014-05-19 21:21 +0000
    Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? hummingbird <hummingbird@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-21 09:09 +0100
      Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-05-21 15:52 +0000
        Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? hummingbird <hummingbird@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-22 10:43 +0100
  Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-05-19 19:28 -0300
  Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-05-20 10:15 +0300
    Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2014-05-20 00:22 -0700
      Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Pat Wilson <patwilson@example.com> - 2014-05-20 07:36 +0000
        Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-20 03:55 -0400
        Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2014-05-20 05:22 -0700
          Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-05-20 13:54 -0300
            Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2014-05-20 18:22 +0100
              Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2014-05-20 13:32 -0400
                Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2014-05-20 18:58 +0100
              Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-05-20 15:20 -0300
                Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2014-05-20 20:26 +0100
      Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-20 20:47 +0000
        Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "Tommy" <tommyleprechaun@yohoo.com> - 2014-05-20 22:36 +0100
          Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2014-05-20 15:29 -0700
            Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "Tommy" <tommyleprechaun@yohoo.com> - 2014-05-21 00:43 +0100
              Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-21 05:05 +0000
                Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-21 04:43 -0400
                Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-05-21 08:08 -0300
                Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "Tommy" <tommyleprechaun@yohoo.com> - 2014-05-21 22:12 +0100
                Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-21 22:56 +0000
                Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "Tommy" <tommyleprechaun@yohoo.com> - 2014-05-22 00:04 +0100
                Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-21 19:27 -0400
                Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> - 2014-05-21 20:25 -0400
            Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-21 05:04 +0000
              Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-21 04:43 -0400
        Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-05-20 19:19 -0300
          Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2014-05-21 00:47 +0100
            Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Spit the Cat <supersecret@IPaddress.invalid> - 2014-05-21 01:51 +0100
              Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "p-0''0-h the cat (ES)" <super.pooh@furryfreeware.invalid> - 2014-05-21 01:52 +0100
                Re: [OT]Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2014-05-21 08:02 -0300
              Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? ~BD~ <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> - 2014-05-21 13:01 +0100
          Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-05-21 05:13 +0000
  Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-05-20 15:17 +0100
    Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-20 10:34 -0400
    Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? hummingbird <hummingbird@127.0.0.1> - 2014-05-22 09:29 +0100
  Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? "Yes" <noone@invalid.invalid.com> - 2014-05-21 13:40 +0000
  Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Travis Bickle <3S96@taxi.net> - 2014-05-21 16:20 -0400
  Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-05-22 11:41 -0400
  Re: Is there a weight-loss app that doesn't require the net? Jax <remove.bear.bottoms1@gmail.com> - 2014-05-26 21:17 +0100

csiph-web