Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1353178

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree

Show all headers | View raw

Hi All,

On 8 March 2016 at 22:52, André Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
> On 07/03/16 11:04, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Wim,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the watchdog tree got a conflict in:
>>
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dts
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>>   d11a89796678 ("arm64: dts: split Foundation model dts to put the GIC separately")
>>
>> from the arm-soc tree and commit:
>>
>>   fe3a97e8ed02 ("ARM64: add SBSA Generic Watchdog device node in foundation-v8.dts")
>>
>> from the watchdog tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
>> is required).
>
> But unfortunately this is the wrong solution. The watchdog DT node
> belongs into the (newly created) common foundation-v8.dtsi, not into the
> GICv2-only .dts.
> So whoever now provides the watchdog patch, can it be rebased on top of
> the foundation model .dts rework, so that the new node ends up in the
> .dtsi file?

I can rebase this patch to make a  watchdog DT patch for
foundation-v8.dtsi ASAP.

Thanks

> If this is too much hassle I could also send a fix after -rc1 (as the
> breakage is not really critical).
>
> Cheers,
> Andre.
>



-- 
Best regards,

Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch
Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct)
Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile)
Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15,
One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District,
Shanghai,China 200021

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-03-07 05:10 +0100
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2016-03-07 06:50 +0100
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc  tree Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-03-07 13:20 +0100
      Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2016-03-07 20:10 +0100
        Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc  tree Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-03-08 11:20 +0100
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be> - 2016-03-07 20:00 +0100
      Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2016-03-07 20:10 +0100
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc  tree André Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2016-03-08 17:00 +0100
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org> - 2016-03-08 17:10 +0100
      Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc  tree Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-03-08 18:00 +0100
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc  tree Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-03-08 17:10 +0100
      Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc  tree André Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2016-03-08 17:20 +0100

csiph-web