Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1353185

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree

Show all headers | View raw

On 08/03/16 23:06, Sudeep Holla wrote:

Hi Sudeep,

> On 08/03/16 15:52, André Przywara wrote:
>> On 07/03/16 11:04, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi Wim,
>>>
>>> Today's linux-next merge of the watchdog tree got a conflict in:
>>>
>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dts
>>>
>>> between commit:
>>>
>>>    d11a89796678 ("arm64: dts: split Foundation model dts to put the
>>> GIC separately")
>>>
>>> from the arm-soc tree and commit:
>>>
>>>    fe3a97e8ed02 ("ARM64: add SBSA Generic Watchdog device node in
>>> foundation-v8.dts")
>>>
>>> from the watchdog tree.
>>>
>>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
>>> is required).
>>
>> But unfortunately this is the wrong solution. The watchdog DT node
>> belongs into the (newly created) common foundation-v8.dtsi, not into the
>> GICv2-only .dts.
>> So whoever now provides the watchdog patch, can it be rebased on top of
>> the foundation model .dts rework, so that the new node ends up in the
>> .dtsi file?
>> If this is too much hassle I could also send a fix after -rc1 (as the
>> breakage is not really critical).
>>
> 
> I have rebased it on top of my earlier PR and sending it shortly.
> I have moved it to dtsi file.

Thanks, that was quick!

Hope that this now does not collide with Fu Wei's fix ;-)

Cheers,
Andre.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-03-07 05:10 +0100
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2016-03-07 06:50 +0100
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc  tree Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-03-07 13:20 +0100
      Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2016-03-07 20:10 +0100
        Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc  tree Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-03-08 11:20 +0100
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be> - 2016-03-07 20:00 +0100
      Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2016-03-07 20:10 +0100
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc  tree André Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2016-03-08 17:00 +0100
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org> - 2016-03-08 17:10 +0100
      Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc  tree Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-03-08 18:00 +0100
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc  tree Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-03-08 17:10 +0100
      Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc  tree André Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2016-03-08 17:20 +0100

csiph-web