Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1352826
| From | Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree |
| Date | 2016-03-08 11:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ramUa-7VY-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r9UEy-6fS-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <r9Wdj-7a3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ra2iK-2IY-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <ra8Hv-6WP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | ARM |
On 07/03/16 19:00, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:19 AM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote: >> Hi Olof, >> >> On 07/03/16 05:41, Olof Johansson wrote: >>> >>> Hi Wim, >>> >>> It's much easier for us if all DTS changes go in through the arm-soc >>> trees, to avoid these kind of conflicts. Is this on a branch where you >>> can easily drop it and we pick it up instead, or is it on a now-stable >>> branch? >>> >> >> Sorry for that. Since the patch series was still under discussion and >> v14 was posted 3 days ago, I had not checked with Fu Wei on his plans >> for DTS changes. >> >> Let me know if you want to pick up this single patch directly or want me >> to send PR for that if Wim drops it from his branch. I might have couple >> of DTS warning fixes for juno/vexpress(though I need to wait for Rob's >> acks to them), so I can bundle them together. > > We're short on time for -rc7, most material should have been in by > now. So you might want to send this separately if you think Rob will > time out. > I agree, but the warnings I mentioned got introduced last Friday after Rob updated DTC in -next. > I'm OK with either applying directly or you bundling with other 64-bit > DTS material. Either way, send to arm@kernel.org and we'll pick it up > from there. > OK, will do that. -- Regards, Sudeep
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-03-07 05:10 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2016-03-07 06:50 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-03-07 13:20 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2016-03-07 20:10 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-03-08 11:20 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be> - 2016-03-07 20:00 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2016-03-07 20:10 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree André Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2016-03-08 17:00 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org> - 2016-03-08 17:10 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-03-08 18:00 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-03-08 17:10 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree André Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2016-03-08 17:20 +0100
csiph-web