Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1353168
| From | André Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree |
| Date | 2016-03-08 17:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rasdc-2OP-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <r9UEy-6fS-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | ARM Ltd. |
On 07/03/16 11:04, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Wim,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the watchdog tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dts
>
> between commit:
>
> d11a89796678 ("arm64: dts: split Foundation model dts to put the GIC separately")
>
> from the arm-soc tree and commit:
>
> fe3a97e8ed02 ("ARM64: add SBSA Generic Watchdog device node in foundation-v8.dts")
>
> from the watchdog tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
But unfortunately this is the wrong solution. The watchdog DT node
belongs into the (newly created) common foundation-v8.dtsi, not into the
GICv2-only .dts.
So whoever now provides the watchdog patch, can it be rebased on top of
the foundation model .dts rework, so that the new node ends up in the
.dtsi file?
If this is too much hassle I could also send a fix after -rc1 (as the
breakage is not really critical).
Cheers,
Andre.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-03-07 05:10 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2016-03-07 06:50 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-03-07 13:20 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2016-03-07 20:10 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-03-08 11:20 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be> - 2016-03-07 20:00 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2016-03-07 20:10 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree André Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2016-03-08 17:00 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org> - 2016-03-08 17:10 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-03-08 18:00 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2016-03-08 17:10 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree André Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2016-03-08 17:20 +0100
csiph-web