Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts

From	"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts
Date	2016-08-10 10:24 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<nofo06$7v7$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <6m1i7d-qo5.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57a67179$0$1664$c3e8da3$12bcf670@news.astraweb.com> <p29i7d-rf6.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57a901eb$0$29121$c3e8da3$38634283@news.astraweb.com> <b5gn7d-p2o.ln1@mail.specsol.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll 
posts:
>
Aviation Consultant <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote :
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>> Jim Pennino , jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>
>>>>>> Full Swine Glazier reber g=emc^2, the Cretin wrote:
>>>>>>>> i count 7.
>>>>>>
>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>> The Full Swine Reber Glazier can start by counting himself as #1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Basically few with any knowledge or education will post here because 
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> the paid disruptors. And that is what is desired so that the
>>>>>> establishment dogma is maintained and any intelligent discussions of
>>>>>> non-politically correct "forbidden" subjects get ridiculed and 
>>>>>> hounded
>>>>>> until they give up. Trolls are pros so they never give up.
>>>>>
>>>> Aviation Consultant Jim Pennino , jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> Kook babble: "paid disruptors", "establishment dogma", ""forbidden" 
>>>>> subjects"
>>>>
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>> Hey air-boy, JP, I never said I wasn't one of the 7. I"m just not 
>>>> number
>>>> one, sadly. Still filling your stash with Federal Reserve notes 
>>>> thinking
>>>> you are rich? Too funny.
>>>
>> Aviation Consultant Jim Pennino , jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> I never said you were.
>>> Accumlating cash money is stupid on many levels; have you ever heard of
>>> high yield, no load mutual funds?
>>
> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>> Yes I have and even better, such pieces of paper actually resent real
>> physical objects (companies, their assets, trademarks, and other real
>> objects of worth...as opposed to cash money which represents ownership
>> in hot air and debt.
>
Aviation Consultant Jim Pennino , jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Cash money represents the collective willingness to exchange it for
> goods and services.
> Only the ignorant and kooks thing it has to be backed by gold bars in
> some vault.
>
hanson wrote:
There seem to be different strokes from, for and by different folks.
>
TV-News channels air commercials, every day, where Gold-holding
Companies sell their precious & stable gold to you in exchange for
your worthless paper money that you earn, hold and saved.
>
How do these companies stay in business with all that worthless
paper money in their coffers, while you own & hold their gold? LOL
>
There seem to be different strokes from for and by different folks.

Thread

Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-08-06 12:11 +0000
  Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-06 10:41 -0700
    Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-06 13:43 -0500
    Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 12:40 -0700
      Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-06 16:13 -0400
        Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-06 21:33 +0000
          Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-06 19:23 -0400
            Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-06 23:39 +0000
              Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-06 19:33 -0500
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-07 01:00 +0000
              Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-08 18:04 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-08 23:11 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-10 10:24 -0700
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-10 17:13 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-10 21:43 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-10 18:30 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-11 00:16 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-10 21:49 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-08-11 13:03 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-11 06:10 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-11 17:39 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-11 22:14 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-11 22:22 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-12 03:48 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-12 10:17 -0700
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-12 16:02 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-12 21:20 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-12 19:40 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-12 18:56 -0500
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-12 17:01 -0700
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-12 20:43 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-12 18:36 -0700
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-13 02:46 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-13 00:14 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-12 20:38 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-13 02:47 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-13 19:30 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-14 00:47 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-13 21:48 -0400
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-14 04:57 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-13 17:03 +0000
                Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-10 19:31 -0500
    Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts 7 <7@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-08-07 20:12 +0000
  Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-08-06 12:39 -0700
    Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-08-07 08:38 -0700
  Re: Just two to three trolls account for majority of sci.physics troll posts Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-08-07 13:50 -0700

csiph-web