Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1293427
| From | Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver |
| Date | 2015-12-17 01:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qGuLU-ws-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <qG7Pk-2RZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qG8BJ-3aD-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qG94K-3zE-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qG94K-3zE-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qGhbX-ou-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> writes: > On 16 December 2015 at 02:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski > <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> wrote: >> 2015-12-16 10:11 GMT+09:00 Sebastian Reichel <sre@ring0.de>: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 04:53:31PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: >>>> >> There are 6 power domain drivers in >>>> >> arch/arm, 3 in drivers/clk, and 3 in drivers/soc. >>>> > >>>> > If we ever have to support a different architecture which happens to use >>>> > a similar power domain, then we want it to be in a location which makes >>>> > it easy for sharing it in the first place. As it stands today, it does >>>> > not seem useful to me to have this code in arch/arm/mach-bcm/ at all. >>>> > >>>> > Maybe there is room from a drivers/power/domains/ of some kind? >>> >>> I like the idea, but let's include generic power domain maintainers >>> in this discussion, as I suggested here (I got a power domain driver >>> patch for drivers/power just a few days ago): >>> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/15/815 >>> >>> Also somebody would have to step up to maintain that directory. >> >> This could go into drivers/soc. We put there a lot of mach-specific >> stuff which we want to make a little more generic (like generic enough >> multiplatform, multiarchitecture etc). Rockchip has its own power >> domains there. Dove and Mediatek seem as well but I am not sure. Some >> other architectures keep this still in arm/mach (exynos, ux500, zx, >> imx, s34c64xx, shmobile) but this looks more of like a legacy choice. > > Agree, drivers/soc is good. OK, I've resent with a move to drivers/soc/bcm/.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> - 2015-12-15 22:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 23:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> - 2015-12-16 01:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2015-12-16 01:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> - 2015-12-16 02:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Sebastian Reichel <sre@ring0.de> - 2015-12-16 02:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-12-16 02:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2015-12-16 11:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> - 2015-12-17 01:40 +0100
csiph-web