Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1292689
| From | Sebastian Reichel <sre@ring0.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver |
| Date | 2015-12-16 02:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qG94K-3zE-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <qG5DQ-1iE-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qG6gy-1N2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qG7FE-2zx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qG7Pk-2RZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qG8BJ-3aD-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi, On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 04:53:31PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > >>> What motivated the location of this power domain driver in > >>> arch/arm/mach-bcm? Should not we have this in drivers/power/ or > >>> somewhere in drivers/ at the very least? > >> > >> ls stronly suggests that power contains drivers for power supplies and > >> batteries, not power domains. Indeed it's used for fuel gauges and chargers, but also for reboot/powerdown and adaptive voltage scaling, so another subdirectory for power-domains wouldn't be that odd. > >> There are 6 power domain drivers in > >> arch/arm, 3 in drivers/clk, and 3 in drivers/soc. > > > > If we ever have to support a different architecture which happens to use > > a similar power domain, then we want it to be in a location which makes > > it easy for sharing it in the first place. As it stands today, it does > > not seem useful to me to have this code in arch/arm/mach-bcm/ at all. > > > > Maybe there is room from a drivers/power/domains/ of some kind? I like the idea, but let's include generic power domain maintainers in this discussion, as I suggested here (I got a power domain driver patch for drivers/power just a few days ago): https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/15/815 Also somebody would have to step up to maintain that directory. > The great thing about git is that moving code is easy, even after it's > first committed. > > The subsystem maintainer didn't comment on the code's location in v1 or > v2, and I think they probably have the final say on that. Whatever they > want, where there is currently a genpd driver, is fine with me. sounds reasonable. P.S.: Thanks for taking bringing RPI support upstream :) -- Sebastian
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> - 2015-12-15 22:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 23:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> - 2015-12-16 01:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2015-12-16 01:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> - 2015-12-16 02:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Sebastian Reichel <sre@ring0.de> - 2015-12-16 02:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-12-16 02:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2015-12-16 11:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> - 2015-12-17 01:40 +0100
csiph-web