Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1292689

Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver

From Sebastian Reichel <sre@ring0.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver
Date 2015-12-16 02:30 +0100
Message-ID <qG94K-3zE-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <qG5DQ-1iE-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <qG6gy-1N2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qG7FE-2zx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qG7Pk-2RZ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qG8BJ-3aD-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi,

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 04:53:31PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> >>> What motivated the location of this power domain driver in
> >>> arch/arm/mach-bcm? Should not we have this in drivers/power/ or
> >>> somewhere in drivers/ at the very least?
> >> 
> >> ls stronly suggests that power contains drivers for power supplies and
> >> batteries, not power domains.

Indeed it's used for fuel gauges and chargers, but also for
reboot/powerdown and adaptive voltage scaling, so another
subdirectory for power-domains wouldn't be that odd.

> >> There are 6 power domain drivers in
> >> arch/arm, 3 in drivers/clk, and 3 in drivers/soc.
> >
> > If we ever have to support a different architecture which happens to use
> > a similar power domain, then we want it to be in a location which makes
> > it easy for sharing it in the first place. As it stands today, it does
> > not seem useful to me to have this code in arch/arm/mach-bcm/ at all.
> >
> > Maybe there is room from a drivers/power/domains/ of some kind?

I like the idea, but let's include generic power domain maintainers
in this discussion, as I suggested here (I got a power domain driver
patch for drivers/power just a few days ago):

https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/15/815

Also somebody would have to step up to maintain that directory.

> The great thing about git is that moving code is easy, even after it's
> first committed.
>
> The subsystem maintainer didn't comment on the code's location in v1 or
> v2, and I think they probably have the final say on that.  Whatever they
> want, where there is currently a genpd driver, is fine with me.

sounds reasonable.

P.S.: Thanks for taking bringing RPI support upstream :)

-- Sebastian

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> - 2015-12-15 22:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2015-12-15 23:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> - 2015-12-16 01:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2015-12-16 01:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> - 2015-12-16 02:00 +0100
          Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Sebastian Reichel <sre@ring0.de> - 2015-12-16 02:30 +0100
            Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-12-16 02:30 +0100
              Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2015-12-16 11:10 +0100
                Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> - 2015-12-17 01:40 +0100

csiph-web