Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.misc > #17777

Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1

From Rich <rich@example.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.misc
Subject Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1
Date 2019-04-06 13:35 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <q8a9vc$b93$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <q862fi$f6s$1@panix2.panix.com> <ggofeiF87l2U2@mid.individual.net> <ggog28Ff419U3@mid.individual.net> <ggpeerFeu2pU1@mid.individual.net> <87tvfbr8d4.fsf@bogus.nodomain.nowhere>

Show all headers | View raw


Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> wrote:
> 
> Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> writes:
> 
>> Like (I suspect) many (most?) Unix users, I use the most appropriate
>> tool for the job, GUI or CLI. With a "desktop enviroment", I have the
>> choice. I presently have 5 GUI tools running and 4 CLI's on 4 desktops.
> 
> I'm 4 for six.  And *no* "desktop environment".  X sits on top of
> Unix/Linux (so to speak) and a window manager sits on top of X. [1]

Same here.  With Fvwm2 being the window manager.

> A "desktop environment" puts yet another huge load (pun intended) of 
> complexity on top of X in place of a simple window manager.  It 
> brings with it all sorts of superfluous stuff that, AFAICT, is mostly 
> there, as the OP opined, to make *ix "like Windoes".

Exactly.  And auspicisiouly to make it 'easy', but in reality simply 
hides so much that the user who does not know how never learns how, and 
the user who does know how, is hampered by "not following the DE's 
rules".

> An example is the "task bar".  Once it's there, app devs require a 
> task bar for their code to work.  The task bar is just another "do it 
> our way because it's better and you'll like it" bit of chrome.

Yep, and there is, sadly, a lot of that type of thinking in the DE 
space.  And Gnome is esp. bad at attempting to force "the one and only 
true way" that the dev's believe onto anyone using it.

> Yeah, I'm being condescending to Huge here.  He deserves it given his
> intemperate and vulgar responses to folks to disagree with him.

There is a reason I added him to my kill file a long time ago.  His 
postings are about 75% him being an insulting arse.  The remainder 
seldom ever add anything of any substance.  So he earned "kill file" 
status here a long time ago.

> "No DE" is not the same as "green terminal".

Also correct, but the Huge arse (pun intended) in the group seems to 
believe that there is either a VT100 green screen or a full bloated 
hand holding DE with no options in between.

Back to comp.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 RS Wood  <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2019-03-28 22:03 -0400
  Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Oregonian Haruspex <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-03-29 06:36 +0000
  Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net> - 2019-04-04 16:07 +0000
    Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-04-04 17:16 +0000
      Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-04 21:15 +0000
        Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2019-04-04 19:03 -0400
          Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-05 07:46 +0000
            Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-04-05 07:56 +0000
              Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-05 16:35 +0000
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2019-04-06 02:49 -0300
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-06 09:07 +0000
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2019-04-06 07:48 -0400
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-04-06 11:56 +0000
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2019-04-06 09:44 -0400
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-04-06 13:53 +0000
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-04-06 13:35 +0000
          Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-04-05 13:35 +0000
            Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-04-05 13:38 +0000
              Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-05 16:36 +0000
    Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2019-04-05 12:25 +0300
    Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Steve555 <Steve555@reallybogus.nodomain.nowhere.invalid> - 2019-06-17 21:39 +0000
      Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-06-18 00:22 +0000
      Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2019-06-19 06:46 +0000

csiph-web