Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 |
| Date | 2019-04-06 13:35 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <q8a9vc$b93$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <q862fi$f6s$1@panix2.panix.com> <ggofeiF87l2U2@mid.individual.net> <ggog28Ff419U3@mid.individual.net> <ggpeerFeu2pU1@mid.individual.net> <87tvfbr8d4.fsf@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> |
Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> wrote: > > Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> writes: > >> Like (I suspect) many (most?) Unix users, I use the most appropriate >> tool for the job, GUI or CLI. With a "desktop enviroment", I have the >> choice. I presently have 5 GUI tools running and 4 CLI's on 4 desktops. > > I'm 4 for six. And *no* "desktop environment". X sits on top of > Unix/Linux (so to speak) and a window manager sits on top of X. [1] Same here. With Fvwm2 being the window manager. > A "desktop environment" puts yet another huge load (pun intended) of > complexity on top of X in place of a simple window manager. It > brings with it all sorts of superfluous stuff that, AFAICT, is mostly > there, as the OP opined, to make *ix "like Windoes". Exactly. And auspicisiouly to make it 'easy', but in reality simply hides so much that the user who does not know how never learns how, and the user who does know how, is hampered by "not following the DE's rules". > An example is the "task bar". Once it's there, app devs require a > task bar for their code to work. The task bar is just another "do it > our way because it's better and you'll like it" bit of chrome. Yep, and there is, sadly, a lot of that type of thinking in the DE space. And Gnome is esp. bad at attempting to force "the one and only true way" that the dev's believe onto anyone using it. > Yeah, I'm being condescending to Huge here. He deserves it given his > intemperate and vulgar responses to folks to disagree with him. There is a reason I added him to my kill file a long time ago. His postings are about 75% him being an insulting arse. The remainder seldom ever add anything of any substance. So he earned "kill file" status here a long time ago. > "No DE" is not the same as "green terminal". Also correct, but the Huge arse (pun intended) in the group seems to believe that there is either a VT100 green screen or a full bloated hand holding DE with no options in between.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2019-03-28 22:03 -0400
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Oregonian Haruspex <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-03-29 06:36 +0000
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net> - 2019-04-04 16:07 +0000
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-04-04 17:16 +0000
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-04 21:15 +0000
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2019-04-04 19:03 -0400
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-05 07:46 +0000
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-04-05 07:56 +0000
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-05 16:35 +0000
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2019-04-06 02:49 -0300
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-06 09:07 +0000
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2019-04-06 07:48 -0400
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-04-06 11:56 +0000
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2019-04-06 09:44 -0400
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-04-06 13:53 +0000
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-04-06 13:35 +0000
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-04-05 13:35 +0000
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-04-05 13:38 +0000
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-05 16:36 +0000
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2019-04-05 12:25 +0300
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Steve555 <Steve555@reallybogus.nodomain.nowhere.invalid> - 2019-06-17 21:39 +0000
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-06-18 00:22 +0000
Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2019-06-19 06:46 +0000
csiph-web