Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.misc > #18246

Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1

From Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com>
Newsgroups comp.misc
Subject Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1
Date 2019-06-19 06:46 +0000
Organization Some absurd concept
Message-ID <eli$1906190238@qaz.wtf> (permalink)
References <f0b0nf-e25.ln1@rasp.therandymon.com> <87ftqxvjnr.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <qe91am$1v6c$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


In comp.misc, Steve555  <Steve555@reallybogus.nodomain.nowhere.invalid> wrote:
> On 2019-04-04, Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net> wrote:
>> 	* Sxiv -- lightweight (libx11-based UI, Imlib2) image viewer;
...
>> 	* Xfig -- though I'm somewhat of an XML fan, this one still beats
>> 	  Inkscape in the easy-to-use and runs-really-fast departments;
> That's a nice list.  It's good to see someone else likes XFig!

I use xfig, too. I want to like Inkscape, but it always frustrates me.
(Xfig does, too, but not as much. Mostly just the clunkiness of the
ancient widgets used.)

> I didn't know about Sxiv - I tried it out, it's pretty good :-)
> I also like wmiv, fim and feh image viewers.

I (heart-emoji) feh. I find feh does everything I want, including giving
me a UI to sort images into directories (via the -A and the numbered
actions). 

> Another good little program that doesn't get mentioned often is vifm, which
> is a terminal file manager.  There used to be programs like this on O2/2.
> I guess mc does similar stuff.

I have never understood the appeal of file managers. I have a shell,
ls, sort, find, du, etc. That's everything.

Elijah
------
knows find real well now

Back to comp.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 RS Wood  <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2019-03-28 22:03 -0400
  Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Oregonian Haruspex <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-03-29 06:36 +0000
  Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net> - 2019-04-04 16:07 +0000
    Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-04-04 17:16 +0000
      Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-04 21:15 +0000
        Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2019-04-04 19:03 -0400
          Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-05 07:46 +0000
            Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-04-05 07:56 +0000
              Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-05 16:35 +0000
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2019-04-06 02:49 -0300
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-06 09:07 +0000
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2019-04-06 07:48 -0400
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-04-06 11:56 +0000
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2019-04-06 09:44 -0400
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-04-06 13:53 +0000
                Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-04-06 13:35 +0000
          Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-04-05 13:35 +0000
            Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Bob Eager <news0073@eager.cx> - 2019-04-05 13:38 +0000
              Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-04-05 16:36 +0000
    Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2019-04-05 12:25 +0300
    Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Steve555 <Steve555@reallybogus.nodomain.nowhere.invalid> - 2019-06-17 21:39 +0000
      Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2019-06-18 00:22 +0000
      Re: Linux archeology: KDE 0.1 Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2019-06-19 06:46 +0000

csiph-web