Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #157529

Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now!

From Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now!
Date 2015-09-07 23:50 +0200
Message-ID <q6csx-116-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <q5BW1-7SJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <q5Z2i-7dA-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6a7n-6db-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Monday 07 September 2015 20:09:12 Bob Holtzman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 05:29:14PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> > On 7/09/2015 7:15 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > Carl didn't overstate half as much as calling systemd a cancer with
> > > tentacles. (Do cancers actually have tentacles??).
> >
> > It's plainly obvious, it is exactly what it is.  Read Lennart's own blog
> > if you want more proof, it's all there, unless he has taken it down.
> >
> > I still tend that there should be a desktop version that may or may not
> > optionally have systemd and a server version that definitely does not
> > have systemd.  Not that I would support any version with systemd, but
> > some seem to see it as a desktop enabler of some sort.
> >
> > > I gather Devuan is doing well.  So there are choices.  One of course is
> > > stick with Debian, and work to rename all the libraries whose names
> > > cause such distress. "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet."
> >
> > And re-branding Monsanto is still ... Monsanto.  Renaming is just hiding
> > the facts or at least making them harder to be seen.
>
> Maybe I'm misreading your post but Devuan isn't simply renamed Debian.

If that is addressed at me, yes.  Reread it more slowly.
>
> >From what I gather from the web site, it's Debian *without* systemd.  Yes.

Lisi

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re; Okay, that's too much now! Greencopper <greencoppermine@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 08:50 +0200
  Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2015-09-06 12:30 +0200
    Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 02:30 +0200
  Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2015-09-06 20:40 +0200
    Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2015-09-06 21:40 +0200
      Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 23:20 +0200
        Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2015-09-07 09:30 +0200
          Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Riley Baird <BM-2cVqnDuYbAU5do2DfJTrN7ZbAJ246S4XiX@bitmessage.ch> - 2015-09-07 10:20 +0200
            Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Jessica Litwin <jessica@litw.in> - 2015-09-07 10:20 +0200
              Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2015-09-07 12:20 +0200
          Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Martin Read <zen75502@zen.co.uk> - 2015-09-07 11:30 +0200
          Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> - 2015-09-07 21:20 +0200
            Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2015-09-07 22:10 +0200
              Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 23:50 +0200
              Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:50 +0200
            Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 23:50 +0200
    Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 23:00 +0200

csiph-web