Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now!

From	Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now!
Date	2015-09-08 19:50 +0200
Message-ID	<q6vbQ-2PL-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <q5NXc-8bW-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <q5PvX-23m-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <q5Z2i-7dA-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6a7n-6db-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6aTM-7n0-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 06:05:26AM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 8/09/2015 5:09 AM, Bob Holtzman wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 05:29:14PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> >> On 7/09/2015 7:15 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >>> I gather Devuan is doing well.  So there are choices.  One of course is stick 
> >>> with Debian, and work to rename all the libraries whose names cause such 
> >>> distress. "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet."
> 
> ... this bit "A rose....", see further below.
> 
> >> And re-branding Monsanto is still ... Monsanto.  Renaming is just hiding
> >> the facts or at least making them harder to be seen.
> > 
> > Maybe I'm misreading your post but Devuan isn't simply renamed Debian.
> >>From what I gather from the web site, it's Debian *without* systemd.
> 
> Oh no, I wasn't meaning anything to do with Devuan; Lisi mentioned about
> renaming systemd related parts, my view is that this would just mask the
> fact that it is systemd, in effect an attempt to mislead the users as to
> the real facts.
> 
> Devuan is very admirable, great work by them.

Yup, I did misread it! 

-- 

Bob Holtzman
A fair fight is the result of poor planning.

Thread

Re; Okay, that's too much now! Greencopper <greencoppermine@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 08:50 +0200
  Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2015-09-06 12:30 +0200
    Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 02:30 +0200
  Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2015-09-06 20:40 +0200
    Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2015-09-06 21:40 +0200
      Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 23:20 +0200
        Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2015-09-07 09:30 +0200
          Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Riley Baird <BM-2cVqnDuYbAU5do2DfJTrN7ZbAJ246S4XiX@bitmessage.ch> - 2015-09-07 10:20 +0200
            Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Jessica Litwin <jessica@litw.in> - 2015-09-07 10:20 +0200
              Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2015-09-07 12:20 +0200
          Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Martin Read <zen75502@zen.co.uk> - 2015-09-07 11:30 +0200
          Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> - 2015-09-07 21:20 +0200
            Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2015-09-07 22:10 +0200
              Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 23:50 +0200
              Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:50 +0200
            Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 23:50 +0200
    Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 23:00 +0200

csiph-web