Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #157526

Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now!

From Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now!
Date 2015-09-07 21:20 +0200
Message-ID <q6a7n-6db-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <q5BW1-7SJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <q5N18-6QV-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <q5NXc-8bW-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <q5PvX-23m-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <q5Z2i-7dA-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 05:29:14PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 7/09/2015 7:15 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > Carl didn't overstate half as much as calling systemd a cancer with tentacles.  
> > (Do cancers actually have tentacles??).
> 
> It's plainly obvious, it is exactly what it is.  Read Lennart's own blog
> if you want more proof, it's all there, unless he has taken it down.
> 
> I still tend that there should be a desktop version that may or may not
> optionally have systemd and a server version that definitely does not
> have systemd.  Not that I would support any version with systemd, but
> some seem to see it as a desktop enabler of some sort.
> 
> > I gather Devuan is doing well.  So there are choices.  One of course is stick 
> > with Debian, and work to rename all the libraries whose names cause such 
> > distress. "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet."
> 
> And re-branding Monsanto is still ... Monsanto.  Renaming is just hiding
> the facts or at least making them harder to be seen.

Maybe I'm misreading your post but Devuan isn't simply renamed Debian.
>From what I gather from the web site, it's Debian *without* systemd.

-- 

Bob Holtzman
A fair fight is the result of poor planning.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re; Okay, that's too much now! Greencopper <greencoppermine@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 08:50 +0200
  Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2015-09-06 12:30 +0200
    Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 02:30 +0200
  Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2015-09-06 20:40 +0200
    Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2015-09-06 21:40 +0200
      Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 23:20 +0200
        Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2015-09-07 09:30 +0200
          Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Riley Baird <BM-2cVqnDuYbAU5do2DfJTrN7ZbAJ246S4XiX@bitmessage.ch> - 2015-09-07 10:20 +0200
            Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Jessica Litwin <jessica@litw.in> - 2015-09-07 10:20 +0200
              Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2015-09-07 12:20 +0200
          Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Martin Read <zen75502@zen.co.uk> - 2015-09-07 11:30 +0200
          Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> - 2015-09-07 21:20 +0200
            Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2015-09-07 22:10 +0200
              Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 23:50 +0200
              Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:50 +0200
            Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 23:50 +0200
    Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 23:00 +0200

csiph-web