Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #157504

Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now!

From Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now!
Date 2015-09-07 09:30 +0200
Message-ID <q5Z2i-7dA-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <q5BW1-7SJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <q5N18-6QV-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <q5NXc-8bW-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <q5PvX-23m-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 7/09/2015 7:15 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Carl didn't overstate half as much as calling systemd a cancer with tentacles.  
> (Do cancers actually have tentacles??).

It's plainly obvious, it is exactly what it is.  Read Lennart's own blog
if you want more proof, it's all there, unless he has taken it down.

I still tend that there should be a desktop version that may or may not
optionally have systemd and a server version that definitely does not
have systemd.  Not that I would support any version with systemd, but
some seem to see it as a desktop enabler of some sort.

> I gather Devuan is doing well.  So there are choices.  One of course is stick 
> with Debian, and work to rename all the libraries whose names cause such 
> distress. "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet."

And re-branding Monsanto is still ... Monsanto.  Renaming is just hiding
the facts or at least making them harder to be seen.

A.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re; Okay, that's too much now! Greencopper <greencoppermine@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 08:50 +0200
  Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2015-09-06 12:30 +0200
    Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Ric Moore <wayward4now@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 02:30 +0200
  Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2015-09-06 20:40 +0200
    Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2015-09-06 21:40 +0200
      Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 23:20 +0200
        Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2015-09-07 09:30 +0200
          Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Riley Baird <BM-2cVqnDuYbAU5do2DfJTrN7ZbAJ246S4XiX@bitmessage.ch> - 2015-09-07 10:20 +0200
            Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Jessica Litwin <jessica@litw.in> - 2015-09-07 10:20 +0200
              Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2015-09-07 12:20 +0200
          Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Martin Read <zen75502@zen.co.uk> - 2015-09-07 11:30 +0200
          Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> - 2015-09-07 21:20 +0200
            Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2015-09-07 22:10 +0200
              Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 23:50 +0200
              Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Bob Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net> - 2015-09-08 19:50 +0200
            Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 23:50 +0200
    Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now! Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 23:00 +0200

csiph-web