Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4299
| From | Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | More precision, read again.. |
| Date | 2018-05-19 12:18 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <pdpip4$muf$6@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Hello, Read this: More precision, read again.. I think that Delphi and FreePascal like ADA come with range checking and Run-time checks that catch conversion from negative signed to unsigned , and catch out-of-bounds indices of dynamic and static arrays and catch arithmetic overflow etc. and you can also dynamically catch this exception of ERangeError etc. But C++ and C don't have range checking, so that's not good in C++ and C because it is not good for safety-critical systems. You can carefully read the following, it is very important: https://critical.eschertech.com/2010/07/07/run-time-checks-are-they-worth-it/ Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
More precision, read again.. Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-05-19 12:18 -0400
csiph-web