Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4300

Yet read again, i correct..

From	Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>
Newsgroups	comp.programming.threads
Subject	Yet read again, i correct..
Date	2018-05-19 12:20 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<pdpisg$muf$8@dont-email.me> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

Hello..

Yet read again, i correct..

I think that Delphi and FreePascal like ADA come with range checking and 
Run-time checks that catch conversion from negative signed to unsigned , 
and catch out-of-bounds indices of dynamic and static arrays and catch 
arithmetic overflow etc. and you can also dynamically catch this 
exception of ERangeError etc.

But C++ and C don't have range checking etc. so that's not good in C++ 
and C because it is not good for safety-critical systems.

You can carefully read the following, it is very important:

https://critical.eschertech.com/2010/07/07/run-time-checks-are-they-worth-it/


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Yet read again, i correct.. Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-05-19 12:20 -0400

csiph-web