Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4299 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-19 12:18 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-19 12:18 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming.threads
More precision, read again.. Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-05-19 12:18 -0400
| From | Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-19 12:18 -0400 |
| Subject | More precision, read again.. |
| Message-ID | <pdpip4$muf$6@dont-email.me> |
Hello, Read this: More precision, read again.. I think that Delphi and FreePascal like ADA come with range checking and Run-time checks that catch conversion from negative signed to unsigned , and catch out-of-bounds indices of dynamic and static arrays and catch arithmetic overflow etc. and you can also dynamically catch this exception of ERangeError etc. But C++ and C don't have range checking, so that's not good in C++ and C because it is not good for safety-critical systems. You can carefully read the following, it is very important: https://critical.eschertech.com/2010/07/07/run-time-checks-are-they-worth-it/ Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming.threads
csiph-web