Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4299

More precision, read again..

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>
Newsgroups	comp.programming.threads
Subject	More precision, read again..
Date	Sat, 19 May 2018 12:18:43 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	22
Message-ID	<pdpip4$muf$6@dont-email.me> (permalink)
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Date	Sat, 19 May 2018 16:18:44 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	h2725194.stratoserver.net; posting-host="6f94b6e509dff52dedc1c2c93682a33f"; logging-data="23503"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+qr6cuYKssIkbyuPXEc+OM"
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
Cancel-Lock	sha1:2iHOwWobbz/QDH0GH8PQY+Nckc4=
Content-Language	en-US
X-Mozilla-News-Host	news://news.eternal-september.org:119
Xref	csiph.com comp.programming.threads:4299

Show key headers only | View raw

Hello,

Read this:

More precision, read again..

I think that Delphi and FreePascal like ADA come with range checking and 
Run-time checks that catch conversion from negative signed to unsigned , 
and catch out-of-bounds indices of dynamic and static arrays and catch 
arithmetic overflow etc. and you can also dynamically catch this 
exception of ERangeError etc.

But C++ and C don't have range checking, so that's not good in C++ and C
because it is not good for safety-critical systems.

You can carefully read the following, it is very important:

https://critical.eschertech.com/2010/07/07/run-time-checks-are-they-worth-it/


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

More precision, read again.. Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-05-19 12:18 -0400

csiph-web