Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #457860

Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity?

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Why does gravity have to be transmitted through particles when gravity isn't a force in general relativity?
Date	2018-05-13 18:47 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<pda17b$156o$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <63f22ffb-6f5d-4666-a172-7aa3139fdc31@googlegroups.com> <0cfc98d7-c7c4-4252-84da-bc881f8e0faa@googlegroups.com> <61e9ae7a-b074-49cd-b52f-591406415302@googlegroups.com> <pcv5ho$1hac$2@gioia.aioe.org> <fa5ae798-a89b-48c4-a640-738739403b0b@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 11:53:31 AM UTC-4, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> kenseto <setoken@att.net> wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, May 8, 2018 at 9:51:31 AM UTC-4, Edward Prochak wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, May 6, 2018 at 10:23:07 PM UTC-4, kenseto wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday, May 6, 2018 at 12:34:42 PM UTC-4, rotchm wrote:
>>>>>> On Sunday, May 6, 2018 at 10:24:34 AM UTC-4, kenseto wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If there is only attractive force then the system is not stable.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Handwaving. Can you back that up with a proof?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Newton proved that with only an attractive force, there are stable
>>>>>> solutions. can you then show where he made an error in his proof?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Newton didn’t provide any proof. He didn’t understand the cause
>>>>> of action at a distance.
>>>> 
>>>> Never read the Principe?
>>> 
>>> So are you claiming that the Principe explains the mechanism for gravity
>>> and the observed action at a distance? I don’t think so.
>> 
>> That isn’t what was discussed here. The proof was that with only an
>> attractive force, there are stable orbits. This you claim is not possible,
>> but Newton showed otherwise. 
> 
> 
> Moron, with only attractive force and without proper high enough orbital
> velocity will cause the moon crash into the earth.

There is only one force and it is attractive. Tangential motion is not a
force. You stated earlier that a repulsive force is required for stability.
This is not true, and Newton proved that a stable orbit is possible with
the only force being attractive. 

Stop squirming, it’s unattractive. 


> The Model Mechanics explanation is correct:
> 1. An attractive EM force between the moon and the earth derived from
> that the moon and the earth are expanding in the same direction as the universe expands.
> 2. The moon and the earth are confined to the divergent structure of the
> E-Matrix as they are moving in the same direction.
> 3. The above opposing forces enables the moon to maintain a stable orbit around the earth.
>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> You are losing what little credibility you have.
>>>> You have already crossed into negative territory
>>>> with many people.
>>>> 
>>>> Ed
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
> 



-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

csiph-web