Re: The Head of the U.S. Coast Guard Isn't Afraid to Talk About Climate Change

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate
Subject	Re: The Head of the U.S. Coast Guard Isn't Afraid to Talk About Climate Change
Date	2018-05-07 01:01 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<pcoq37$15dq$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <fl95cnFd12eU1@mid.individual.net> <pcnoc1$1pjq$2@gioia.aioe.org> <fl9jhdFfu7nU1@mid.individual.net> <8dQHC.119962$mS3.101025@fx04.iad> <fla3oqFj2j6U1@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/6/2018 11:41 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 7/05/2018 2:02 PM, benj wrote:
>> On 5/6/2018 8:04 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>> On 7/05/2018 6:25 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> On 5/6/2018 3:03 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 7/05/2018 12:15 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/6/2018 4:42 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>> Even as other government agencies have quietly banished
>>>>>>> references to
>>>>>>> climate change, the head of the U.S. Coast Guard does not shy
>>>>>>> away from
>>>>>>> the subject that the White House has made practically taboo:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://foreignpolicy.com/2018/05/04/the-head-of-the-u-s-coast-guard-isnt-afraid-to-talk-about-climate-change/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> yep, by golly, that 0.1 mm/year sea rise,
>>>>>
>>>>> **Try an OBSERVED (not predicted, nor modelled) rate of 2.8 ~ 3.6mm
>>>>> PA.
>>>>> With the increased melt from Greenland, that rate is expected to
>>>>> increase.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OOOOOOOOOOOOOhhh  MMMYY  !!
>>>>
>>>> the Coastguard ships cannot withstand 1/10 of an inch of rise in water
>>>> level !!!
>>>
>>> **Here is YOUR claim:
>>>
>>> "yep, by golly, that 0.1 mm/year sea rise, computer predicted by some
>>> aggressive global worming computer modeling problems on closed data, has
>>> worried the shit out of some unemployed contract journalists on how they
>>> can make money off it."
>>>
>>>
>>> Do you now admit your lie?
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   computer predicted by some
>>>>>> aggressive global worming computer modeling problems on closed data,
>>>>>
>>>>> **Well, given your data is hopelessly wrong, we can safely disregard
>>>>> your lies.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   has
>>>>>> worried the shit out of some unemployed contract journalists on
>>>>>> how they
>>>>>> can make money off it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> **How about you supply real data?
>>>>
>>>> no need, the article is FAKE NEWS on its face.
>>>>
>>>
>>> **How about your lies? When will you take responsibility for them?
>>> Here, again, are your lies:
>>>
>>> "yep, by golly, that 0.1 mm/year sea rise, computer predicted by some
>>> aggressive global worming computer modeling problems on closed data, has
>>> worried the shit out of some unemployed contract journalists on how they
>>> can make money off it."
>>>
>>> Here's your chance to admit your lies and apologise, once and for
>>> all. Do it now, or will you dig yourself an even deeper hole?
>>>
>>>
>> Actually BOTH Sergio and Trevor need spanked. The .1mm/year figure is
>> just wrong. The correct MEASURED figure is about 2mm a year.
> 
> **So, according to your un-referenced claim, Sergio is out by 2000%,
> while I am out by around 30%.
> 
> Let's call a spade a bloody shovel. Sergio lied. Big time. 

prove it, kookie,  got url ?

it will need an error analysis along with it to show it can accuractly
measure 0.1mm, including orbital pertabation, sun effect on atmosphere,
temperature at time of measurement, etc.

did you know the sea rises both toward the  moon and toward the sun over
one to three feet, (and on opposite side as well)? and with that water
displaced it took water away from 90 degree points from sun and moon,
how many feet is that ?

are these two entire earth effects taken into the error analysis with
your above URL you might supply ?

or are you going to punt ?

https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/kits/tides/tides02_cause.html


<snip>

Thread

csiph-web